We have reached a conclusion on this one?
]]>Let's define the terms properly.
good: Makes you healthy and strong when you eat it.
Thus, protein is good for you. => protein is good for you because it makes you healthy and strong.
bobbym is mostly protein.
=> we must eat bobbym !!!
Bob
]]>What if we look at the conclusion as if it says that if we are bobbym (which we would never do) it would be good for us.
]]>Alternatively, question whether the word 'good' is sufficiently well defined to allow it to be used as it it is the same in all the statements.
Bob
]]>I noticed those myself.But take, for example, bobbym's syllogism about proteins.
]]>There's even a
But I wasn't going to say anything, as you were obviously having such fun.
Bob
]]>I think that's a little longer than the original I heard...
Didn't really understand it 'til now.
bobbym wrote:Protein is good for you.
I am mostly protein.
I am good for you?no.you are mostly good for me.
lol i am protein.
]]>My eyes talk,
my heart sings:
...I'm so a crazy mixed-up kid.
My hands speak,
my fingers do the walking:
...I'm totally a crazy mixed-up kid.
Thanks, I appreciate that.
Hi Sylvia104;
This is off topic but I thought you would be interested in this:
]]>Protein is good for you.
I am mostly protein.
I am good for you?
no.you are mostly good for me.
]]>I google, therefore I don't think.
Conclusion: My existence is in doubt!
The Thinker: food for thought...
]]>