You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Here are the maths:
These would be the pseudo-laws
[list=1]
[*]A purpose is a human's mind specific notion.[/*]
[*]A purpose of an action is only relevant when considered from the actor's perspective.[/*]
[*]The actor's mind must in advance be equipped with the said feature(the notion of a purpose) in order for any of this actor's actions to have a purpose.[/*]
[*]No action ever started by this actor prior to be provided with this feature can ever have a purpose.[/*]
[/list]
These would be the realisations
[list=*]
[*]This is why the notion of purpose in only applicable to action purposely done by human(or any other being equipped with the said feature).[/*]
[*]Since life is older than the existence of the notion of a purpose, expecting life to have a purpose would be something like:[/*]
[/list]
They can only take events that have already happened, and fit them to the writings.
P.S: In terms of human longevity, I sometimes startle myself wandering about the following approximation:
The longest confirmed human lifespan / the age of the earliest evidence for life on Earth ≈ a second / a year
Pages: 1