You are not logged in.
The sentence in the puzzle says:
“Remove a different number of jelly babies from each box, weigh the boxes.”
That wording is misleading.
It really means:
“Remove jelly babies from the boxes and weigh what you removed.”
Not weigh the boxes themselves. right?
Hi, this puzzle:
https://www.mathsisfun.com/puzzles/weighing-jelly-babies-solution.html
is very complex puzzle I couldn't solve it or understand it
first I want to know did we put all the cartoons on the scale or only the 510 grams?
I mean maybe there is a lot of jelly babies around 1000g or more..
so are we measuring only the 51 ones that we take out or all of the boxes?
The straight lines drawn from the vertex of the conic surface to points on
surface are on that surface.

my question is there stright line that the book talking about I see it not straight! I see it curved!! what is going here mr bob
hi is there interacrtve math is fun or similar that for example when I write 5/100 it show me how many squares there is
like 100/100 it show 100% or 35% small squares representing it in a square shapes or whatever
like activity or a game or whatever in MIF?
Thanks for the reply.
Can you see this image?
https://i.postimg.cc/4KJ9rhFk/symmetry-on-parabola.gif
And what about this?
https://i.postimg.cc/bvn9SxxJ/symmetry_on_parabola.gif
The first looks small and a bit blurred for me.
The second is larger and much sharper.
Both have the img /img format.
I'll repeat what I said in post 4. The y axis is the line of symmetry. The red and green lines are at 90 degrees to the axis and are bisected by it.
Bob
still not working
can you please send the photo to me that diagram not shown to me in email?
ntikna@gmail.com
or
zaidalimajeed@gmail.com
please I really wanna to visualize the chord that he mean and the diamerter
Hi, there is some of MIF links that contain Adobe flashplayer, but it's no longer working
like that link:
https://www.mathsisfun.com/games/counting-bugs.html
the game is working only with adobe but flashplayer is not working anymore since 2021
is there a solution in the future for that link run the app in differnet player or something like that pls
for example others sites switch from the dead flashplaer to ruffle flashplayer it's working on all browser and supported
https://ruffle.rs/
(4) is the one they says should work for forums. That's what used when I changed post 4.
If none then what?
What device are you using? Does your own image show ok?
Maybe Phrontister will have some ideas for you. He has been a great help in sorting out the image problem for me.
Bob
I used imgur as you can see how I show me photo in my post I used it like that :
[img]https://i.imgur.com/ulr1DUQ.png(here type if image png or jpeg)[/img]
and I'm using a laptop windows 11 on chrome browser and my own image is showing no problems
I used a lot of methods at first it not worked untell i USED THAT CODE
[img]THE LINK[/img]
I only put the link image in the middle https://i.imgur.com/ulr1DUQ.png
but with .png or .jpeg at the end so it show perfectly
Definition By an angle is meant a point (called the vertex of the angle) and two rays (called the sides of the angle) emanating from the point. If the vertex of the angle is point A and if B and C are any two points other than A on the two sides of the angle, we speak of the angle /BAC or LCAB or simply of angle ZA.
III-4. If <BAC is an angle whose sides do not lie on the same line and if A'B is a ray emanating from A', then there is one and only one ray A'C' on a given side of line A'B', such that <B'A'C' <BAC. In short, a given angle can be laid off on a given side of a given ray in one and only one way. Every angle is congruent to itself.
The Axiom's Goal: It guarantees that if you have an angle in one place, you can perfectly recreate it in another place. It proves that measurement is portable.
I understand only the goal when I read it.
but the reast the axiom itself I can't understand it
that's another modern explanation:
Hilbert’s Axiom III, 4 (The Angle Construction Axiom)
"Let angle(h, k) be an angle in a plane alpha and let a be a straight line in a plane alpha'. Let a definite side of a in alpha' be assigned. Let h' be a ray of the line a emanating from a point O'. Then there exists a unique ray k' such that the angle angle(h', k') is congruent to the angle angle(h, k)
I can't understand is there a step by step explanation please and a diagrams examples
I'm so sorry this is proving so hard for you. My new image site offers the following possibilities. I'll number them so you can say which works for you.
(1) https://postimg.cc/4KJ9rhFk
(2) https://i.postimg.cc/bvn9SxxJ/symmetry_on_parabola.gif
(3) [symmetry_on_parabola.gif](https://postimg.cc/4KJ9rhFk)
(4) https://i.postimg.cc/4KJ9rhFk/symmetry_on_parabola.gif
(5) <a href="https://postimg.cc/4KJ9rhFk" target="_blank"><img src="https://i.postimg.cc/4KJ9rhFk/symmetry_on_parabola.gif" alt="symmetry_on_parabola"></a>
(6) https://i.postimg.cc/bvn9SxxJ/symmetry_on_parabola.gif
(7) <a href="https://postimages.org/" target="_blank"><img src="https://i.postimg.cc/bvn9SxxJ/symmetry_on_parabola.gif" alt="symmetry_on_parabola"></a>
(4) is the one they says should work for forums. That's what used when I changed post 4.
If none then what?
What device are you using? Does your own image show ok?
Maybe Phrontister will have some ideas for you. He has been a great help in sorting out the image problem for me.
Bob
mr bob can u upload it using another sites there is too much sites in web for free and past the link here pls
Can u send me a link I'll open
Success with posting image:
https://i.postimg.cc/4KJ9rhFk/symmetry-on-parabola.gif
This shows a parabola f(x) = x² with the y axis as the line of symmetry. This is the axis your book is referring to.
The red and green lines are at 90 degrees to this axis and, as the axis is a line of symmetry, each is bisected by the axis.
You can try the same with the other curves. Circle is easy. You'll need a good equation plotter for the ellipse and hyperbola. There is one here:
https://www.mathsisfun.com/data/grapher-equation.html
Hope that helps.
Bob
The image is not showing bob
Yes, I understand your confusion. The language is English but it's not how a modern English person would put it.
I used Google AI to get to the modern meaning. As it's a topic I am familiar with, I'll re-phrase myself.
The diagram shows a set of conic sections: a circle, an ellipse, a parabola, and (part of) a hyperbola. All these geometric shapes have a line of symmetry, usually called the axis. (The circle has many and the ellipse has two.)
Chords drawn across the axis at right angles to the axis are always bisected (cut in half) by the axis.
Hope that helps.
Bob
Can you please show me a diagram or imge
Pointing at the chord and the right angle and the unique diameter
Hi there is old blanks like yahoo messenger or ICQ
But there is no option for Whatsapp or telegram or facebook
Or discord or snapchat
I read from that book first pages: The most accurate English translation of Apollonius’s Conics (which is his main work) is by R. Catesby Taliaferro and Michael N. Fried, published by Green Lion Press.
I read: Apollonius’s his predecessor characterized the
curves by using the unique diameter that makes right angles with the chords,,

The question is where is that chord they mean here can u show me simple diagram as example
I didn't understand the full sentence where is the unique diameter and the right angle and the cord?
hi, 1/7 is a ecurring decimal mean it's move forver infinitiy right?
if I want to represt 1.5 as a length like 1.5 meter or 2 meter or 0.5 meter
it's easy
but how to represent the 1.7 as meter let say there is a stick its length is 1.7 meter! is that possible?
and can I divive the recuring decimal over other numbers? like 1/7 divided by 3
can exmplain more pls about how to treat these ecurring decimal numbers or is there textbooks explain these to me
oh thanks for that golden information now I can use the protractor professional
but why when trying to extend them in my draw sheet they meet from up side?
they shouldn't meet right
I always draw the same lines angles and they meet!
is that because the direction of the second line maybe it called negative? or it's from another plane or what I know the parallel lines won't meet in the two directions
In your diagram the line made by 100 degrees should slope away from the other line as 100 is obtuse. These lines are parallel.
Bob
But if O extend them from the top won't they meet?
hi,
in this link :
https://mathcs.clarku.edu/%7Edjoyce/java/elements/bookVI/propVI4.html
I Quote from : Now, since the angle DCE equals the angle ABC, DC is parallel to FB. Again, since the angle ACB equals the angle DEC, AC is parallel to FE.
depending on the right link : (I.28) as you can see on the page in the right that blue link
that leads to proposition 28 book I (https://mathcs.clarku.edu/%7Edjoyce/java/elements/bookI/propI28.html)
the problem he is saying DCE equals the angle ABC but it's not like proposition 28 said
because DCE and ABC is corresponding angels which the proposition 28 didn't mention anything about it just talk about alternate angels,
so how cold they depend on something that in its turn didn't mention them or talk about!!!
please explain it's very necessary to me
What is wrong in proposition 28 Book 1 of Euclid elements the sum of the interior angles on the same side equal to two right angles, then the straight lines are parallel to one another
I can draw easily with handwrite on a papers two lines adds up two right angels but they are not parallel? So what's wrong?
and I draw an example in the following photo and here is the link and Quote of the proposition 28
proposition 28 book 1
If a straight line falling on two straight lines makes the exterior angle equal to the interior and opposite angle on the same side, or the sum of the interior angles on the same side equal to two right angles, then the straight lines are parallel to one another
the photo I draw and tried as u will see the straight line fall on the two lines and and draw the first left angel 100 degree and the other 80 so they add up to 180 but not parallel! the proposition consist of two sections the first section is clear and I understand it but after "or the sum of the interior angles on the same side equal to two right angles, then the straight lines are parallel to one another.... is not clear"
on MIF https://www.mathsisfun.com/geometry/triangles-similar-finding.html
in the SAS example "side, angle, side"
there is two triangles, he found that these two is similar
because thier ratios are equal
21 : 14 which is 3/2
and
15 : 10 which is 3/2
my problem is he divide Traingle1 Side over Traingle two Side
and divide the second side which is 15 of traingle 1 when the second side of the traingle two which is 10
but in Similar Topic on MIF https://www.mathsisfun.com/geometry/similar.html
in the Example named " Example: What is the missing length here?"
he divided the blue triangles with its sides themselves : 130/127 which is blue traingle side over blue traingle second side
and equal to ?/80 which is red side over red side
now how to check the similarity exactly by dividing one side of a traingle with the other traingle side? or using the same side of the traingle
for example traingle with side x1 and x2 and another traingle with side y1 and y2
the similarity check is using : x1 over y1 equal to x2 over y2
or : x1 over x2 equal to y1 over y2?
Abot half way he gets to the formula
Then he takes the right angled triangle with shorter sides r and x, and enlarges it by a scale factor of yz so it becomes rxz by by xyz. He adds on other enlarged triangles.
Bob
why he enlarged the r and x by yz
What for?
And next step he enlarge the sides r and y by
z.(x^2+r^2)^1/2 Why exactly this equation?
Mr Bob it's a useful book thank you so much
In this YouTube link
https://youtu.be/6KPSmajeseI
He is talking about heron's proof
He is talking about scaling a traingle
Starting in minute 1:01
What is a traingle scaling and is there on MiF
Napier is credited with the invention of logarithms. He wrote that book in Latin and Macdonald translated it into English. But the style and language is Napier's.
The table is a list of logarithmic values. Before the invention of computers and calculators, logarithms were used to enable calculations without the need for long multiplication and division. When I was at school we were given such a table and taught how to use them.
There's a page about him in Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Napier
If you want to learn about logs then I recommend the MIF page:
https://www.mathsisfun.com/algebra/logarithms.htmlHope that helps,
Bob
Mr bob where can I found that table it's not there in MIF and tutorial for how to use it
Here's the link.
yes but there is a table where is that table the book is talking about table of logarithm