You are not logged in.
No,not sure.
I can use that inside the bracket to solve log(base 4) 2 to log/(base2)4 ....
Thanks
Ok I was having problem with Latex.... and yes thats write.
1/log(base a)b = log(base b)a ,is that what you wanted to know
Thanks
May be its simple but I can't solve it...
Show that : log2(2log(base 4) 5 + 1) = 1
Thanks
Thanks everybody...
In a book ,I saw this statement
"An algebraic expression containing two terms is called a binomial expression.
, , etc are binomial expressions.
For example
Similarly, an algebraic expression containing three terms is called a trinomial."
Is it correct to say "an algebraic expression containing two terms is called a binomial expression or
three terms is called a trinomial" as binomial and trinomial are polynomials and a polynomial is made up of terms that are only added, subtracted or multiplied. and I think
Thanks bobbym for the link http://www.themathpage.com/aprecalc/factorial.htm
as I was searching factorial problems involving variables and it had some great stuff.
I know about mathisfun ,I meant some advance stuff
Thanks again...
Now I got it thanks guys, it was so simple ,my book didnt have enough of factorials its more about permutation can you guys give me some resource on factorials...
Thanks
Ok I have seen this in my book too but ,I didn't understood how
expands into ,is their any special rules or am I missing something very basicI can't solve this one ...
Find n ,if
Thanks
Is this step of this inequation is correct,I got it from a book and I guess its wrong or may be I am missing something
How come the sign changed? To me it doesnt make any sence.
Thanks
Read this
http://www.mathsisfun.com/algebra/quadr … ation.html
Good Luck
Well I was a bit busy so I couldn't post...
@bob bundy ,thanks I have also got the same answer.
@ bob bundy
Ok I did all the problems,but I have some question regrding post #9 where you posted about question 2.
There's also something to consider at x = 0, as the expression goes to infinity there. It looks as though this will go to - infinity on one side of zero and + infinity on the other.
Well how can x = 0 makes the expression goes to +/- infinity as dividing anything by 0 is undefined,and x is the denominator.
What solution set did you got for question 2 , 3 and 4?
Thanks
Thanks but I want to try this and the other problems by myself now,but if I got stuck anywhere I will post it here.
Thanks...
Well a program should behave what its programmed for. If it's programmed to use Newton's method, it will and its the same what you do on paper. But at the same time computers have limitations. In this case the limitation is on decimal points ,computers work only with binary numbers they don't understand decimal points they dont even understand negative numbers
in binary we can only have positive whole numbers {0,1,2,...} and even whole numbers are limited ,the range will depend on the bits you are using to describe the number.
So how come we can calculate decimal and negative stuff on our computers?
Computers use a special format to represent decimal points, normally in the world of programming we say floating point numbers for decimal point numbers ex .. {0.25,0.55,...}.It is important to know that binary floating point system can only represent a finite number of floating point numbers in exact form, its because the number of bits used to represent the floating point system, if you exceed that limit then you will loose the precision.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating_point
You have to need programming knowledge to understand these...
If you want to know more about this format search "Floating-Point " IEEE is the most commonly used format.
Here is an example floating point numbers and their precision on my 32bits computer programmed in a C++ compiler with ANSI/ISO C++ standards
float type data gives 6 digit precision.
double type data gives 10 digit precision.
Good Luck
'if you multiply or divide by a negative, you must reverse the inequality'. Do you know and understand this rule?
Yes,I understand this rule.
You can finish by considering (0,+3) and showing it is legitimate to add this to the range
Well now its a bit more clear,I have to consider/assume the ranges (-3,0) and (0,+3) but I don't understand the logic just because +/-3 makes the denominator 0,in many inequation it happens but we don't have to choose those cases,what my problem was I havent looked at different cases,but still this problem is not clear properly the logic behind choosing the cases ,when I reduced the equation to
from here why I can't able to solve the inequation ?, may be I need more time .bob bundy what you did I understood totally and appreciate it.
Well thanks for helping me out
Sorry still can't understand...
You can see that + / - 4 is calculable
How can x be +/- 4 ,lets put it in the equation and see
Taking x as 4
So I think x can't be +/- 4
between -3 and + 3 satisfy the inequality.
Yes I can understand that,but how you came upto "-3 < x < 0" we just cant guess any range I want to know what are the steps,in your post #2 the case 1 is ok it gives
but case 2 doesn't give any result expect than x is 0 and case 3 which you actually explained in post #5 gives but as already given . But thats not the answer and still where is .Thanks for the reply
Here are the other questions
Question 2
Question 3
Question 4
Question no 4 I think I may solve it .... but the rest I tried but no result till now.
And thanks bob bundy for the reply
Well still I am having problem to understand it...
As function tends to +/- infinity at x = +/- 3 we should look at 5 cases
(-∞,-3) (-3,0) 0 (0,3) (3, ∞)
How you can take the case (-∞,-3) as x can't be -4 or 4 ?
I did it a different way I just assumed two cases when x>= 0 and x<0
Here is what I am doing
Well I have four inequations that I can't able to understand properly,what are the steps you guys will take to solve this...
Question 1
I can understand my solution is wrong ,but don't know what steps are used to get the correct solution set.Can anyone show me the proper steps?
Thanks
The (3, -1) is the point.
This point can't be from the equation
,let substitute the values of x and y in the equationI think you have one equation and solving it will be like this
Normally we use intercept to find any two points of a straight line i.e... take x as 0 and solve for the equation and then take y as 0 and solve the equation.
If you take x as 0 then y will be 3
Good Luck
Ok ,I was going to ask to you to show the steps but suddenly I realized that I have got it...
Actually I answered my question in post #9
Thanks for your time bro, "talking to you made my crazy mind to work"
That is my solution with the plus/minus sign inside the root taken as +. I am sure taking the minus sign would work as well.
No the minus will not work in this case , as we are finding y^2 and y^2 cant be negative.
But thats not the big problem of mine...my problem is that I can't get to the answer using this equation
And the correct answer for x and y in my book and every where else is
Another thing I want to say,when I write the equation