You are not logged in.
Hello:
Using the principle of inclusion exclusion.
hello m:
Hello gAr;
That is good but it can also be derived from the principle of inclusion and exclusion.
Oooh yes, I am sorry. It didn't work for me at first. The integral comes from complex analysis? From getting a0 of the Laurent series?
I have that one.
How do you get the integral to say a hundred digits?
What are the Lando lectures?
Hello m:
I could use a bit of help on some M code.
Why do you call it Spasmatica?
Where does the integral come from? How can I evaluate it to many digits?
Hello:
How many Lucky Numbers are there and show 3 ways to find them?
My brother and EVW are crazier than I.
I told that to your brother and he agrees with me. No one anywhere is crazier than you. But we all keep trying
Later I need help on the solution to a problem that they were working on last night and I don't agree that their answer is right.
The plugging in part was not the best idea.
I see that now. So wonderful how they figured it out.
Is there a notebook?
Hello:
Huygen? I thought it was Pascal and Fermat.
I have never encountered any person or creature that was crazier than I.
Nothing truer could ever be said than that
Hi, bobbym.
Hello;
Probability[x < 3,
x \[Distributed] HypergeometricDistribution[4, 3, 8]]
What a charming little tyke. Isn't he adorable?
I noticed his IQ was higher than yours m.
I sure wished they had let him go on trying to prove that sum is convergent
This could be solved by using the built in functions that Mathematica supplies.
The dist function can be improved. We can leave out the radical for faster execution.
It might be compilable. I see why you stuck with the midpoint idea for both.
Working with it a tiny bit you do not need the midpoint idea at all. There is an IntersectRegion command that might work better.:)
Hello M:
Thanks for all the work. Why did you choose polar coordinates and not vectors or the Sector command for the sectors? Can you post the Mathematica code when you get a chance?
Hello:
Yes I do!:)
Bobbym:
Can you show how?
I am a little confused on the new methods of verifying the correctness of answers obtained through empirical means such as these. JB and PB were over here giving a lecture that I attended and I am afraid most of it was over my head. EA also explained it but I did not get it. Can you give your explanation. See you later
I tried it and it worked. I am just learning the program.
That is to 8 digits of precision. The amount the program allows in the increment box. Is there a way to get an answer that is even better?