Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
You are not logged in.
#51 2012-12-14 20:39:05
- julianthemath
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
1326
Star members have too many stars. So, if I congratulate new star members, so, that means I need more stars for my picture?
#52 2012-12-14 20:47:43
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
1378, Halley's comet visited the earth.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#53 2012-12-15 10:53:08
- julianthemath
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
Star members have too many stars. So, if I congratulate new star members, so, that means I need more stars for my picture?
#54 2012-12-15 11:22:22
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
Hi;
1485 Battle of Bosworth Fields.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#55 2012-12-15 20:16:58
- julianthemath
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
Star members have too many stars. So, if I congratulate new star members, so, that means I need more stars for my picture?
#56 2012-12-15 20:49:12
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
1596 Descartes is born.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#57 2012-12-15 23:25:55
- julianthemath
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
1651
Star members have too many stars. So, if I congratulate new star members, so, that means I need more stars for my picture?
#58 2012-12-15 23:57:07
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
1711 = 29 * 59
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#59 2012-12-18 22:32:48
- julianthemath
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
1762
Star members have too many stars. So, if I congratulate new star members, so, that means I need more stars for my picture?
#60 2012-12-18 22:53:16
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
1830 was the year of the fifth US population census.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#61 2012-12-19 21:41:16
- julianthemath
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
1893
5 years before the Philippine Independence!
Last edited by julianthemath (2012-12-19 21:41:44)
Star members have too many stars. So, if I congratulate new star members, so, that means I need more stars for my picture?
#62 2012-12-19 21:56:44
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
1953 A very good year. End of the Korean war.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#63 2012-12-19 21:58:35
- julianthemath
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
2015
3 years from now...
Star members have too many stars. So, if I congratulate new star members, so, that means I need more stars for my picture?
#64 2012-12-19 22:00:37
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
2080, there are 312 primes less than this number.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#65 2012-12-20 10:28:39
- julianthemath
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
2146
Star members have too many stars. So, if I congratulate new star members, so, that means I need more stars for my picture?
#66 2012-12-20 10:59:20
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
julianthemath wrote:
1651
This number is erronous. It should be 1653!
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#67 2012-12-20 11:03:42
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
2212 a biggie.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#68 2012-12-20 11:15:50
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
2346 to keep up to the count...
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#69 2012-12-20 11:18:43
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
2415 = 1^3 + 1^3 + 6^3 + 13^3
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#70 2012-12-22 11:00:45
- julianthemath
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
2
4
8
5
Star members have too many stars. So, if I congratulate new star members, so, that means I need more stars for my picture?
#71 2012-12-22 16:19:43
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
Hi;
2556 is the 71st triangular number.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#72 2012-12-23 14:44:53
- julianthemath
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
2638
2638
2638
2638
Star members have too many stars. So, if I congratulate new star members, so, that means I need more stars for my picture?
#73 2012-12-23 20:57:04
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
2701 = 3^3 + 7^3 + 10^3 + 11^3
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#74 2012-12-24 22:51:27
- julianthemath
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
2775
Star members have too many stars. So, if I congratulate new star members, so, that means I need more stars for my picture?
#75 2012-12-24 23:22:22
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.
2850 = MMDCCCL
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.