Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ π -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,610

Hi;

I have missed your solutions and if you notice I have been training young anonimnystefy and others to follow in our footsteps!

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,462

Hi,

Yes, I too miss math. I need to find a way which can give me plenty of time!

I have noticed it, you are doing a good job.

It's nice to get hold of computers and math early.

See you later.

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,610

Thanks, he is a good student so it is easy.

See you later.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,859

bobbym wrote:

Thanks, he is a good student so it is easy.

See you later.

Ahahahahahahaha... This is so funny, my tummy hurts!

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,610

Hmmmm, why is that such a reason for extreme jocularity?

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,859

bobbym wrote:

You got it!

New problem:

A die is rolled 20 times. What is the probability that the maximum value of the faces is 3?

A says) I still think it is:

What is you answer?

Hi bobbym

*Last edited by anonimnystefy (2012-11-25 09:52:45)*

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,859

bobbym wrote:

Hmmmm, why is that such a reason for extreme jocularity?

It is very funny. Me a good student!

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,610

Hi;

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,610

**New Problem:**

**Baffler #222**

**The line y = x + 5 intersects the curve y = x^2 - 2x at points A and B . If we place Point C on the curve ( beneath A and B ) what is the maximum area of triangle ABC we can make? ( see the diagram )**

**A says) 20.**

**B says) That is close, the real answer is (7 +**

**C says) 20 sounds about right to me.**

**D says)C, why do always interrupt B before he can put his answer down? You know he is always wrong.**

**E says) I think he was right, I am getting that too.**

**What is the maximum area that can be attained?**

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,859

Hi bobbym

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,610

Hi;

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,859

Hi

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,610

Hi;

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,859

Ahahahahahahahaha!

Btw, for a moment there I thought that D would actually realize the truth!

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,610

He will catch on eventually.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,859

Can't wait!

On the other hand, it seems that A and C will never catch on!

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,610

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,859

Hi

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,610

Hi;

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,859

Hi

Thanks!

I will post my solution during the weekend if I remember!

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,610

Hi;

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,610

**New problem:**

**Baffler #223**

**A circle of unknown diameter has two perpendicular chords drawn in it. They are of the sizes given in the drawing. Find the area of the circle.**

**A says)290 sqr whatever.**

**B says) Nope.**

**C says) 3.14159... sqr units**

**D says) What are we talking about.**

**E says) I got it and it only took 5 minutes!**

**Find that area!**

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,859

Hi bobbym

It's okay.

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**White_Owl****Member**- Registered: 2010-03-03
- Posts: 99

The more I think about the problem #1 in this thread, the less I believe in the answers given to it in this thread

I do not think we can talk about percentage of white marbles in the jar at all. We can talk only about probabilities.

At the beginning we have 50 blue and 50 white.

On a first step we can remove 25 blue, 25 white or any number of blues and white (up to 25). So after putting 25 blue ones back into the jar we can have either:

50b+50w, or 75b+25w, or some numbers in between.

After repeating this process the second time, numbers can become 50b+50w, or 100b+0w, or some numbers in between.

In other words, after 10 steps we can have 50% marbles in the jar are white, or 0% (possibly even after the second step) or any number between 0 and 50.

*Last edited by White_Owl (2012-12-06 10:58:57)*

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,610

Hi anonimnystefy;

Hi White_Owl;

What problem are you talking about?

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline