Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
You are not logged in.
#526 2013-02-17 03:56:05
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Then there are some E's in there.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#527 2013-02-17 03:57:24
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
_ _ _ e _ _ _ _ _ _ _
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#528 2013-02-17 03:57:49
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
A in there somewhere?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#529 2013-02-17 04:02:19
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
_ a _ e _ _ _ _ _ _ _
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#530 2013-02-17 04:04:22
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
An S please.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#531 2013-02-17 04:18:10
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
s a _ e _ _ _ s _ _ _
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#532 2013-02-17 04:23:44
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
We need an O!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#533 2013-02-17 04:34:54
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
s a _ e o _ _ s _ _ _
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#534 2013-02-17 04:39:15
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
How about an I?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#535 2013-02-17 06:43:04
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
s a _ e o _ _ s _ i _
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#536 2013-02-17 08:44:33
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
How about an L?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#537 2013-02-17 10:05:05
#538 2013-02-17 10:09:47
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Give me a N.
Last edited by bobbym (2013-02-17 11:18:24)
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#539 2013-02-18 02:05:33
#540 2013-02-18 02:16:24
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Save our ship?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#541 2013-02-18 02:17:47
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
yes.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#542 2013-02-18 02:20:32
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
I will guess an E.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#543 2013-02-18 07:28:36
#544 2013-02-18 07:35:27
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
How about an A?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#545 2013-02-18 07:39:34
#546 2013-02-18 07:41:05
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Now I will take an I.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#547 2013-02-19 12:16:53
#548 2013-02-19 12:32:38
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
How about an S?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#549 2013-02-20 10:52:20
#550 2013-02-20 11:11:12
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Maybe an L?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.