Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #26 20130223 06:34:11
Re: Moving CirclesRemember it is the radius squared. Last edited by bobbym (20130223 06:34:44) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #27 20130223 06:46:32
Re: Moving Circles
Pardon my ignorance, I thought I've explained it well before, but I guess I haven't. Last edited by SmellyMan (20130223 06:47:01) #28 20130223 06:53:02
Re: Moving CirclesHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #29 20130223 06:57:44
Re: Moving Circles
We know the exact position of the tanks, their exact radius, their movement speed, as well as the full length of their paths, as well as their starting and ending points. #30 20130223 07:08:36
Re: Moving CirclesWhat do you want to do with that? What question are you asking? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #31 20130223 07:14:21
Re: Moving Circles
I'm asking when and at what point will one tank start shooting other units. I'm also asking for how long that tank will shoot that unit. #32 20130223 07:19:15
Re: Moving CirclesWhen you say how long would you be satisfied with n seconds or do you want an answer like 39 seconds? Last edited by bobbym (20130223 07:19:38) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #33 20130223 07:23:24
Re: Moving Circles
n seconds is understandable to me. Basically it's just a matter of figuring out basing on the information we have (radius of the tank shooting range, his movement speed, path length and the direction of his path). #34 20130223 07:32:34
Re: Moving CirclesHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #36 20130223 11:01:23
Re: Moving CirclesHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 