Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ π -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,661

Then that is the point, the warning is extraneous since a legitimate problem might not have a solution.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**ShivamS****Member**- Registered: 2011-02-07
- Posts: 3,442

Offline

**phrontister****Real Member**- From: The Land of Tomorrow
- Registered: 2009-07-12
- Posts: 3,819

Hi Bobby and Shivam. Yes, doing it that way with the 'correction' tab in post #1 should work well.

It will also help with scalpel hair preservation, eliminate dental visits related to bruxism and contribute to the fight against global warming.

"The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,661

Okay, the first 2 I get. Global warming?

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**phrontister****Real Member**- From: The Land of Tomorrow
- Registered: 2009-07-12
- Posts: 3,819

Working on the 'corrected' version will generate much less 'frustration heat' compared with that of spending fruitless time wrestling with (and stewing/pondering over) a puzzle that seemingly is unsolvable, and, given MIF's puzzles' popularity and the therefore-expected huge number of would-be solvers of this puzzle, the total amount of such heat saved should be a very significant amount indeed.

So, conservatively and without overstating anything, I'd estimate that the mean temperature of the earth will drop at least very slightly, if not a bit more (or maybe a bit less).

*Last edited by phrontister (2014-06-04 01:46:47)*

"The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,661

Then I am all for it. We must lower the mean temperature and lower the mean people as well. Meanness must be stamped out.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**phrontister****Real Member**- From: The Land of Tomorrow
- Registered: 2009-07-12
- Posts: 3,819

I see what you mean!

Btw, 'meane', 'mein', 'mene', 'mesne' and 'mien' are all homophones of 'mean'.

"The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,661

Btw, 'meane', 'mein', 'mene', 'mesne' and 'mien' are all homophones of 'mean'.

With my typing, I have been treating them as equals.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**phrontister****Real Member**- From: The Land of Tomorrow
- Registered: 2009-07-12
- Posts: 3,819

That's where human 'context recognition' comes to the fore/4/faugh/faw/for/four.

*Last edited by phrontister (2014-06-04 23:53:41)*

Offline

**ShivamS****Member**- Registered: 2011-02-07
- Posts: 3,442

Can you read this?

I cnduo't bvleiee taht I culod aulaclty uesdtannrd waht I was rdnaieg. Unisg the icndeblire pweor of the hmuan mnid, aocdcrnig to rseecrah at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mttaer in waht oderr the lterets in a wrod are, the olny irpoamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rhgit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whoutit a pboerlm. Tihs is bucseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey ltteer by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Aaznmig, huh? Yaeh and I awlyas tghhuot slelinpg was ipmorantt! See if yuor fdreins can raed tihs too.

*Last edited by ShivamS (2014-06-06 00:27:22)*

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,661

Hi;

Yes, I can read that but at a bit of a speed reduction. Suggesting that at least for me some computation to reorder the letters is happening.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**phrontister****Real Member**- From: The Land of Tomorrow
- Registered: 2009-07-12
- Posts: 3,819

Yes, I can read that too...with some rearranging pauses here and there.

Iv'e (obverse ahtoopprse pioiotsn-pblmrsaeuy i'ts ltaemiitge) aaedrly rvieeecd shneoimtg slaiimr form eensoom how tguhhot I'd lkie it. ): (seilmy is fcark-to-bnut...sheetul'slurpsl sopt taht).

Is ltnghe irtapnmot? (nlmaey, "paaeeiiiiiiooooooooouucccccclllmmnnnnprrsssstvs" & "aaaaeeiiiiibdhlmnnnrsssstttm").

Waht auobt hoeatnnhpyis, scuh as "w-wllokenn" (sudnos saoemhwt Gmraen).

Csilllimooquas mhgit aslo be clgaihnnelg (try "gmueapzd", mnnaieg "tnimrpug the ciottoipemn").

Can you "slitl raed it whuotit a pbelrom"? ('qteoud' form oaiingrl pgsaase).

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here's the solution, but I'll hide it in case anyone would like to try to unravel the tangle themselves:

*Last edited by phrontister (2014-06-05 23:44:45)*

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,661

Much more difficult and I can only read part of it.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**ShivamS****Member**- Registered: 2011-02-07
- Posts: 3,442

The one I posted is readable for me with a few pauses.

The one posted by phronister is unreadable.

A lot of examples at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typoglycemia

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,661

Typoglycemia?

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**phrontister****Real Member**- From: The Land of Tomorrow
- Registered: 2009-07-12
- Posts: 3,819

*Typoglycemia*:

Wikipedia article here.

Also gets a guernsey in the 'Worthless word for the day-an obscure words refactory' website here.

And...there are typoglycemia generators/scramblers available on the net.

I didn't look very far, but I haven't found the word in any dictionaries yet.

I've edited post #62 to now include the solution to the tangle that I posted there.

*Last edited by phrontister (2014-06-05 23:45:56)*

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,661

It appears that is a good memory jogger. Once I have read the line translated and I come back to the encoded line I can read it easily.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**phrontister****Real Member**- From: The Land of Tomorrow
- Registered: 2009-07-12
- Posts: 3,819

The passing of time will heal that and restore your memory once again to that of a normal human's.

But yes, for a while at least, that happens to me too, with the translation leaping out at me automatically. And then my mind tricks me into wondering why anyone would find it so difficult to translate the passage that I now understand so easily; so much so, that at times I feel the need to revise the encoded version to try and make it harder.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,661

There are methods that make readable code and use less letters.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**phrontister****Real Member**- From: The Land of Tomorrow
- Registered: 2009-07-12
- Posts: 3,819

e.g. ?

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,661

I used to see ads on trains for "if u cn rd ths thn u cn b a scrtry"

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**phrontister****Real Member**- From: The Land of Tomorrow
- Registered: 2009-07-12
- Posts: 3,819

I c! So dats whr de txtng lngge evlutn strtd!

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,661

It was a long while back.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**phrontister****Real Member**- From: The Land of Tomorrow
- Registered: 2009-07-12
- Posts: 3,819

But these days, with the social media training that starts as soon as they're out of nappies, any 10-year-old cd b a scrtry.

Offline

Julian's signature once contained something like this.

'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.'

'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'

'Humanity is still kept intact. It remains within.' -Alokananda

**Online**