Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ π -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 83,000

Theoretically, Romberg should be much better than Simpson's.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,883

But, it is more complicated to program, though.

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 83,000

You only need one column and the the formula generates all the rest.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,883

But, how do I know how many values to get for the first column?

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 83,000

You do not. But like a difference table how far you go horizontally depends on how tall the first column is. Each column is more and more accurate, so pick a number n and go from there.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,462

Hi,

Can anyone tell how to find the value of the following integral upto four significant digits with the help of a computer but not a readymade CAS?

J simulation:

```
load 'trig' NB. required for cos
samp =: 1000000 NB. the number of samples
avg =: +/%# NB. the average function
f =: ?samp$0 NB. random numbers in range (0,1)
fn =: cos f*pi%4 NB. get the list of cosines after scaling into range (0,pi/4)
fn100 =: fn^100 NB. get the 100th power
avg fn100*pi%4 NB. Take the average after multiplying (pi/4-0)
```

≈ 0.125139

which is close enough!

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,883

Isn't o. used for trig functions as well?

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,462

trig functions must be loaded.

o.n is pi times n.

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,883

Only when monadic. As dyadic, it represents circle functions: http://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/dodot.htm

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,462

Okay, thanks, did not see that before!

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,883

You're welcome.

The functions are hard to remember.

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,462

Indeed, they are hard to remember and understand.

Anyway, it's good and quick once we get a hang of it. Their documentation is good, but scattered. They need to reorganize that.

E.g. I had to search for quite a long time to find how to change the array values

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,883

I agree. Fortunately, the tutorials I found on that site are great!

How good are you with tacit expressions?

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,462

Yes, and there are essays in that site with very useful programs!

I'm still learning. Are you too trying out J?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,883

Yes, I've seen them. They are fantastic.

I have learned a bit about it, I was amazed by how simple and complex it looks at the same time. Also, the tacit programming part of J caught my eye. I haven't done much in it though.

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,462

Okay, tacit programming is the best part of the language.

But needs much practice to know the rules and use it efficiently.

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,883

Yes, that is pretty much the reason why I could never do much in it.

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

How do I evaluate this?

'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.'

'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'

'Humanity is still kept intact. It remains within.' -Alokananda

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 83,000

What have you tried and although you have posted this in Computer math, I have to ask what method do you want?

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,883

Hi Agnishom

You can use this fact:

I would not recommend it, though.

*Last edited by anonimnystefy (2014-05-21 20:04:36)*

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 83,000

Here is an answer that uses Gaussian integration and has an error of approximately 10^-48

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,883

And the exact answer, given by M is:

*Last edited by anonimnystefy (2014-05-22 00:49:51)*

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 83,000

Hi;

Unless he wants an numerical integration method.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,883

Well, it is the exact answer even if he doesn't want it.

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 83,000

But he has M so why would he not do that himself?

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline