Math Is Fun Forum
  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#1276 2014-04-17 13:15:05

bobbym
Administrator
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 84,473

Re: Bafflers?

Hi;

What does the above factorization combinatorically tell us?


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

#1277 2014-09-11 12:08:37

anonimnystefy
Real Member
From: The Foundation
Registered: 2011-05-23
Posts: 15,354

Re: Bafflers?

That factorization isn't quite correct.


“Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Online

#1278 2014-09-11 19:14:39

bobbym
Administrator
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 84,473

Re: Bafflers?

Hi;

Yes, I am missing the square. I have fixed it.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

#1279 2014-09-11 22:35:27

Olinguito
Member
Registered: 2014-08-12
Posts: 155

Re: Bafflers?

Well,
can be, for example, the number of passwords of at least 1 character and at most 6 characters that can be made from x characters, allowing repetitions.


Bassaricyon neblina

Offline

#1280 2014-09-11 23:30:19

bobbym
Administrator
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 84,473

Re: Bafflers?

Hi olinguito;


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

#1281 2014-09-11 23:30:27

anonimnystefy
Real Member
From: The Foundation
Registered: 2011-05-23
Posts: 15,354

Re: Bafflers?

My money is on the one on the right being the gf of two dice being thrown.


“Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Online

#1282 2014-09-11 23:32:25

bobbym
Administrator
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 84,473

Re: Bafflers?

Hi anonimnystefy;


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

#1283 2014-09-11 23:42:35

anonimnystefy
Real Member
From: The Foundation
Registered: 2011-05-23
Posts: 15,354

Re: Bafflers?

Hi


“Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Online

#1284 2014-09-11 23:44:38

bobbym
Administrator
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 84,473

Re: Bafflers?

I have forgotten that too.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

#1285 2014-09-12 00:03:29

anonimnystefy
Real Member
From: The Foundation
Registered: 2011-05-23
Posts: 15,354

Re: Bafflers?

But what is it needed for?


“Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Online

#1286 2014-09-12 00:05:25

bobbym
Administrator
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 84,473

Re: Bafflers?

To look underneath a hidden tag, especially one for another person.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

#1287 2014-09-12 00:08:29

anonimnystefy
Real Member
From: The Foundation
Registered: 2011-05-23
Posts: 15,354

Re: Bafflers?

A hidden tag?


“Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Online

#1288 2014-09-12 00:10:08

bobbym
Administrator
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 84,473

Re: Bafflers?


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

#1289 2014-09-12 00:23:56

anonimnystefy
Real Member
From: The Foundation
Registered: 2011-05-23
Posts: 15,354

Re: Bafflers?

Ah, okay. I thought you meant a tag like on SE.

Where did you get this problem?


“Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Online

#1290 2014-09-12 00:28:38

bobbym
Administrator
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 84,473

Re: Bafflers?

I was looking at proving combinatoric identities using gf's, it was a while back so...


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

#1291 2014-09-12 01:46:51

anonimnystefy
Real Member
From: The Foundation
Registered: 2011-05-23
Posts: 15,354

Re: Bafflers?

The only thing coming to my mind is that multiplying by 1/(1-x) gives the gf of the partial sums of the sequence given by the rest of the gf.


“Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Online

#1292 2014-09-12 01:48:58

bobbym
Administrator
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 84,473

Re: Bafflers?

Yes, that is correct. So obviously, I had seen or derived something about the throwing of two die.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

#1293 2014-09-12 02:01:29

Olinguito
Member
Registered: 2014-08-12
Posts: 155

Re: Bafflers?

bobbym wrote:


Bassaricyon neblina

Offline

#1294 2014-09-12 02:14:23

bobbym
Administrator
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 84,473

Re: Bafflers?

Hi;


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB