Math Is Fun Forum

  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#51 Re: Help Me ! » Proving! » 2010-11-30 04:53:03

OMG!! What is going on? ampohmeow’s proof for #1 is correct!

ampohmeow wrote:

Is my proof for #1 correct?


Yes. You have proved that when a(−b) is added to ab, the result is 0. This shows that a(−b) is the additive inverse of ab (since additive inverses are unique). As the additive inverse of ab is −(ab) by definition, you have
.

That is all.

ampohmeow wrote:

How to show that if 2a = 0, then a = 0, i don't have here any theorem or axioms that will support the statement.

Oh yes, you do. From the order axioms of the integers, you should be able to get a theorem that the integers form an integral domain – in other words, it has no nonzero divisors of 0. Hence, from 2a = 0, you can conclude that a = 0.

#52 Re: Euler Avenue » Permutations » 2010-11-29 02:13:44

Okay, here is another definition of even and odd permutations.

[align=center]

[/align]

Let’s look at the expression on the right-hand side. The denominator is a product of

factors, and so is the numerator. Let
be a factor in the denominator. Either
or
. In the former case
is a factor in the numberator, while in the latter case
is a factor in the numerator. Conversely, if
is a factor in the numerator, then (as
) either
is a factor in the denominator (if
) or
is a factor in the denominator (if
).

So we see that if

is a factor in the denominator then either
or
is a factor in the numerator and conversely if
is a factor in the numerator then either
or
is a factor in the denominator. It follows that
is always either +1 or −1.
We define
to be even if
is and odd if
.

#53 Re: Help Me ! » Proving! » 2010-11-29 01:40:11

You are making a big mess there. What you need to do is start with the expression

You want to show that it is equal to 0. Using the distributive law gives

Can you carry on from here? What is b + (−b)?

#54 Re: Exercises » Jane’s Exercises III » 2010-11-29 00:33:15

bobbym wrote:

OMG! It’s been such a while since I posted the problem that I’ve forgotten the solution myself! eek

I’ve glanced through your solutions, and I don’t think they look right. Give me some time to remember the solution. neutral

#55 Re: Help Me ! » Proving! » 2010-11-29 00:28:46

Show that
(use the distributive law).

#56 Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » Haiku 2 » 2010-11-29 00:26:04

JaneFairfax
Replies: 4

Here are some haiku poems I recently wrote.

Christmas is coming
Again. Which can mean one thing:
It’s winter again.


I have had enough.
He is more changeable than
The British weather.


What goes round comes round
In time’s eternal cycle.
Can’t wait to come round.


Time is a cycle,
Camusian absurdity,
Existential jail.


How fast does time fly?
No faster, and no slower.
dt/dt = 1. tongue

#57 Re: This is Cool » Cauchy–Schwarz–Bunyakovsky inequality » 2010-11-26 00:46:50

tharun reddy wrote:

...hi jane smile.........but you assumed that "lambda" was real but by setting discriminant to less than zero ur making lambda value imaginary:)
smile

swear

#59 Re: Introductions » Hi from Finland! » 2010-11-22 23:18:25

Hyvää päivää, zonesey! Tervetuloa foorumiin! wave

#60 Euler Avenue » Homeomorphism of Euclidean plane to sphere with point removed » 2010-10-29 00:39:29

JaneFairfax
Replies: 2

It is clear that
is not homeomorphic to a sphere (by which I mean the surface only, not the interior). The latter is compact whereas the former isn’t. However if you remove a single point from the sphere, then the two spaces are homeomorphic.

Let us take the unit sphere centred at

, given by
, and let us remove the north pole
. Call this “pointless” sphere
. Then
is the disjoint union of circles formed by the intersection of
with the plane
as t varies from 0 to 2 (including 0 but not 2).

Now consider

itself. This is the disjoint union of origin-centred circles of all possible non-negative radii (counting
as a circle of radius 0). Let
be any continuous bijection (e.g.
or
).

Then if we define

by
and for

[align=center]

[/align]
where
, we have a homeomorphism!

I was thinking about this last night. Thinking about math problems is a great way to pass the time when you’re having insomnia. tongue

#61 Re: Help Me ! » (Dis)Proof pi = 2 (!) » 2010-10-09 01:55:09

I believe I have a partial solution to the problem. Consider this. With one semicircle, the curve touches the straight line at two points (the end points). With two semicircles, it touches the straight line at three points (the end points and the midpoint). With four semicircles, it touches the line at five points. And so on …

Now if you let the process tend to infinity, it is clear that the endpoints of the semicircular arcs will only touch the straight line at only countably many points of the straight line. It may be impossible to visualize what the infinite curve will be like as those countably many points will be densely spread over the straight line (like the rational numbers on the real line). However, the straight line itself contains uncountably many points! Hence, it is a false assumption that in the infinite limit, the curve will become the straight line itself. It won’t – it will remain longer than the straight line.

#63 Re: Help Me ! » Convergence of Sequence "Does {An^2} converges => {An} converges? » 2010-09-09 02:01:29

cxc001 wrote:

I kinda think it is false, but couldn’t think of any counterexample to directly proof it.

#64 Re: Puzzles and Games » Four People Travel » 2010-09-09 01:51:04

Well, this particular puzzle definitely does not have a unique solution. More clues are needed. smile

#65 Re: Puzzles and Games » Four People Travel » 2010-09-08 06:59:12

bob bundy wrote:

or can anyone explain why there are not lots of solutions:

There are at most 4! = 24 solutions and 24 is not a lot, is it? tongue

#67 Maths Is Fun - Suggestions and Comments » Site URL » 2010-09-04 23:05:45

JaneFairfax
Replies: 1

A moment ago, while trying to access the forums, I wrongly typed the URL as www.mathsisfun.com (with an extra s). I got a white page saying “nothing to see here … move on”.

Wouldn’t it be more convenient if the slightly wrong URL could be made to redirect to the correct one instead? It would save retyping. neutral

#69 Re: Puzzles and Games » Complete the series.... » 2010-08-31 00:06:23

bob bundy wrote:

Is it dedelute ?

bobbym wrote:

#71 Re: Puzzles and Games » Complete the series.... » 2010-08-28 23:20:21

(xlvii) Liverpool, Ars­enal, Liverpool, Ars­enal, ___

#74 Re: Jai Ganesh's Puzzles » 10 second questions » 2010-08-25 00:50:29

ganesh wrote:

Welcome back JaneFairFax!

bobbym wrote:

The thought of once again being able to interact with the legendary JFF has me ecstatic as well!

Thanks guys! It’s nice to feel welcome. touched

#2348. Without using long division, short division, calculator, computer program, Microsoft Excel or any other form of software or technology, calculate 35999999/5999 mentally.

#75 Re: Help Me ! » group theory (simple groups) » 2010-08-20 07:08:38

Sorry, my mistake. sad The Sylow p-subgroup would be unique if p > qr (which was what I was probably thinking of), otherwise it need not be. The other Sylow subgroups also need not be unique.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB