You are not logged in.
Pages: 1 2 3 … 428 Next
From your sentence it would seem as if though GiB was also a mod.
How can you show something that is not correct?
Well, if either of you are not able to say that, there will be some sort of error when trying to run that loop another time.
Also, I admire your ability to gather new solutions by the millisecond.
It will repeat only as long as both of you are actually able to say that.
Hate to say it, but that algorithm can run only a finite number of times.
wz not equal to -1. He used LaTeX without the tags.
I beleive it's closed for quite a while now. It was shown to be undecidable.
You should not use goto. A while loop should suffice.
And, yes, b-a is correct.
You should try to know if there is a set whose cardinality is strictly between that of intehers and real numbers
That is no longer an open problem.
You should try trolling them with the Riemann hypothesis. It's at least a bit more productive.
Reducing to DNF would be a sufficient proof, but it's weird because the question clearly asks for an example of when it is false.
What will I have done to make me famous?
Famous for what?
It puts the "mental" in "experimental".
What I meant is exactly that. They just wanted to say, "if you are proving this to be a tautology, we discourage you from using tables to do so."
I think want to avoid using a table for proving it's a tautology.
Maybe we should try axiomatizing real life before going any further into discussion. I bet that if we succeeded, Hilbert would have been proud.
I do. I love it so much! Need to catch up on a few of the latest ones.
There is not need t define definition yet.
Agnishom is a particular element of the set P called people.
Ah, okay, I get it.
Define purpose and maybe it will.
In the example, isn't 70-60>8?
Mathematics is a superset of reality, so, yes, you do.
I doubt that claim. Can you show that using two different methods?
Powered by FluxBB