You are not logged in.
Thought it'd be pretty simple, but it's HARD! I'll have to have a good think about it tomorrow.
mathsyperson:
Yeah, I had thinking about a similar kind of counter-example when reading through the question, but then I thought maybe I had misread it... in any case I didn't answer it, as I was bothered by the time limit. All the information is definitely present in the question I reproduced, so yeah... I don't know
Stanley_Marsh: erm... I'm still trying to understand it, looks interesting
Well, I had the test yesterday and I got 4/7 of the questions I think! lol
I can remember two of them I couldn't do, and I was curious to see how they could be done:
6. At a party, 100 people are present, and each of them shakes at least one other person's hand. If someone shakes less than 10 peoples' hands, then they get a red shirt. If someone shakes hands with someone who has a red shirt, they get a blue shirt. Some people are lucky enough to get both a red and blue shirt! Show that Number of Blue shirts < Number of Red shirts.
7. There is a set of natural numbers (i, j, k), where i + j + k = 23. Some examples of sets are (1, 1, 21), (21, 1, 1) and (6, 8, 9). S represents the sum of all possible products i*j*k.
S = 21 + 21 + 432 ...
Show that S is divisible by 23.
These aren't exactly how they were worded, but is approximately how I remember them. Thanks.
That's like saying God has always existed, only that we haven't yet found him.
Bravo Mathsisfun!
It's E yeah?
Oh yeah... I missed that mini equilateral triangle... not too hard from here
How can I get going with this question? Thxes
I think we discussed the issue of finding whatever you want inside pi before. Someone said, which I believe, that just because no detectable sequence can be found, that does not mean the digits are random, and we're not garanteed to find anything we want. Probably impossible to prove or disprove that though.
If there was a detectable sequence in pi, it would be able to be expressed as a ratio or fraction, wouldn't it? And I thought euler (or maybe somebody else) disproved that.
Cool, thanks for that. Must take a while to calculate manually
Haha, lame XD
Is it correct that:
I would think that, but my calculator comes up with
. Is it right?Thanks stanley, but isn't that the natural log?
Wow thanks... very deep analysis of the problems, I guess making everything into an equation helps a lot. And yeah, calculators allowed. There are a lot of easier questions on the test which hopefully I'll get my marks off... as for these, well... I'll have to think about them
Well, 0.999... = 1, so 10x - x = 9x when x = 0.999...
Also, I don't understand your original equation... everything in the brackets seems totally useless.
Is there any way to evaluate log to the base 10 of any number without a calculator? I don't really care if it's by trial and error, similar to the trial and error used in finding roots, but is there an algorithm or method to doing it? Thanks.
Thanks for the reply! That's exactly what I was after, but unfortunately I wrote the equation wrong.
It should have been:
(L / (P ^ N)) - (L / (P ^ N) - L) * (1 - G / L)
Lol:P
This stage is as fully simplified as it really needs to be, but if you want it over the same denominator, here are some other variations:
1. Express the number 1/2006 as the sum of the reciprocals of distinct integers of size less than 2006 - that is,
,
where -2006 << 2006 for all i = 1,2, ... , n.
Well... all I really know is that the denominators must multiply to a multiple of 2006... so must be a factor of a multiple of 2006... but what multiple...?
________________________________________________________________________________
2. Find all positive integers less than 10,000 which are equal to five times the product of their digits.
Guess that means:
I've already worked out that d = 5. This is because 1) the number must be a multiple of 5, and 2) no digit may be zero.
Next, every digit must be odd. This is because if any even number is multiplied by 5, the last digit of the product will be 0, and this is not allowed.
So we have:
These are the final two 'puzzle' type questions I'm having trouble with, in addition to the ones I've already posted... preparation for a math test on Wednesday... thanks.
Thanks, I've had some experience with Latex
Is
the original equation?
In that case:
If you have further questions about simplification feel free to ask.
≈19.086
Find all real values of x which fit the given equation:
I've tried graphing it and there are 5 zeros, but how do I find them algebraically?
Heh, this is pretty easy, the first time I won by clicking 'Pick Two' the whole way, second time I clicked 'Pick One' only at the end.
Theoretical Physics can give lots of answers to the riddles of the universe, but I don't think it will ever answer the most fundamental of questions: Why?
≈ 1.263