Math Is Fun Forum
  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#1 2013-01-05 20:18:46

jacks
Member
Registered: 2012-11-21
Posts: 77

Complex no.

(A) If all The Roots of the equation

are of unit Modulus then:

Options:

(B) If

and The equation
has Complex Roots Which are Reciprocal To each other, Then

Options:

Offline

#2 2013-01-05 21:20:11

scientia
Member
Registered: 2009-11-13
Posts: 222

Re: Complex no.


Let the roots be
,
,
, so
. Then:

So (i) and (iii) are true.


We have
so
is true. The others are not necessarily true: e.g.
has complex roots
and
.

Last edited by scientia (2013-01-17 23:43:43)

Offline

#3 2013-01-06 18:35:53

noelevans
Member
Registered: 2012-07-20
Posts: 236

Re: Complex no.

(B)  When a=c we obtain ax²+bx+a= 0 which has roots

       -b±√(b²-4a²) 
                2a

And multiplying these two roots together gives b²-(b²-4a²) = 4a²/4a² = 1.
                                                                          4a²

So the two roots are reciprocals of each other,  BUT the Discriminant is not negative unless
b²<4a².  So |b|<|2a| is required for the roots to be complex (not real roots).

So the first condition would be true if it were |b|<|2a| instead of |b|<|a|. smile

From this problem we see that there are infinitely many complex number pairs that are complex
conjugates AND reciprocals at the same time.  But there is only ONE pair of complex numbers that
are both OPPOSITES AND RECIPROCALS at the same time.  And that would be ...


Writing "pretty" math (two dimensional) is easier to read and grasp than LaTex (one dimensional).
LaTex is like painting on many strips of paper and then stacking them to see what picture they make.

Offline

#4 2013-01-17 18:43:34

jacks
Member
Registered: 2012-11-21
Posts: 77

Re: Complex no.

Thanks scientia and noelevans

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB