Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫  π  -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#1 2013-02-02 09:35:26

ElGreco
Guest

[PROBABILITY] Conditional Independence does not imply Independence

Hello everybody, I have a probability question.

Could you please help me prove that "Conditional Independence does not imply Independence", and vice-versa "(Absolute) Independence does not imply Conditional Independence"?

Every book and online resource seems to take it for granted. They only offer simple counter examples, but I haven't found a formal proof, e.g., by contradiction.
If you can reference a book chapter or post the basics of the proof(s) it would help a lot :-)

~ElGreco

#2 2013-02-02 09:39:44

anonimnystefy
Real Member
From: Harlan's World
Registered: 2011-05-23
Posts: 16,037

Re: [PROBABILITY] Conditional Independence does not imply Independence

Hi ElGreco

A counter-example is all you need. If it is not true in one case, it is not true.

And, welcome to the forum!

Last edited by anonimnystefy (2013-02-02 09:40:08)

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.

Offline