You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

**mathaholic****Member**- From: Earth
- Registered: 2012-11-29
- Posts: 3,251

Let X be 1.

1-Child Policy may be weird (no offense), but I want to discuss about it. They have it in China. Well, I don't think there should be a one-child policy. If that's the case, well, their fertility rate is 1.58, and since it's below 2.10 (Normal Rate), why have it anyway? Here are some of the pros and cons (advantages and disadvantages):

Pros: Will lessen population growth

Cons: What if the president is a second child, third child, etc?

Now, let X be 2.

Not much weird, but it has been planned in the Philippines! Well, at least it's okay to implement it (our fertility rate is 3.1), just 1 above the normal rate. But, what's more weird (no offense) is what Hong Kong has! Imagine a fertility rate of 1.04, should there be even one?

Conclusion: State your opinions about 1 or 2 child policy.

Mathaholic | 10th most active poster | Maker of the 350,000th post | Person | rrr's classmate

Offline

**bobbym****bumpkin**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 109,606

Hi;

I would say they should stop population growth completely. 0 children, in about 100 years everything will be fine.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**** Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.**

Offline

**mathaholic****Member**- From: Earth
- Registered: 2012-11-29
- Posts: 3,251

Oh.

Mathaholic | 10th most active poster | Maker of the 350,000th post | Person | rrr's classmate

Offline

**bobbym****bumpkin**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 109,606

Okay, make it 110 years just to be extra safe.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**** Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.**

Offline

**mathaholic****Member**- From: Earth
- Registered: 2012-11-29
- Posts: 3,251

Okay.

Mathaholic | 10th most active poster | Maker of the 350,000th post | Person | rrr's classmate

Offline

**ShivamS****Member**- Registered: 2011-02-07
- Posts: 3,648

Or work on improving other things which will enable us to support the population growth.

Offline

**bobbym****bumpkin**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 109,606

Now that is truly impossible.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**** Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.**

Offline

**ShivamS****Member**- Registered: 2011-02-07
- Posts: 3,648

So is stopping population growth.

Why not just ban any fancy cars, place high taxes on rich persons etc?

Offline

**bobbym****bumpkin**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 109,606

Why not just ban any fancy cars, place high taxes on rich persons etc?

That will never be possible.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**** Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.**

Offline

**mathaholic****Member**- From: Earth
- Registered: 2012-11-29
- Posts: 3,251

Hmm, I think I have to manipulate my population census. It's crazy to get so much by 2100! (My census reached 11-15 billion there ) So, I will change the lower by year rate to 1.5% from 1%. I'll try.

Mathaholic | 10th most active poster | Maker of the 350,000th post | Person | rrr's classmate

Offline

**bobbym****bumpkin**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 109,606

You have a method?

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**** Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.**

Offline

**mathaholic****Member**- From: Earth
- Registered: 2012-11-29
- Posts: 3,251

In estimating.

Mathaholic | 10th most active poster | Maker of the 350,000th post | Person | rrr's classmate

Offline

**bobbym****bumpkin**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 109,606

What is it?

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**** Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.**

Offline

**mathaholic****Member**- From: Earth
- Registered: 2012-11-29
- Posts: 3,251

The future population. Look at the topic named "Future Population (End of the World in 3136?)"

Mathaholic | 10th most active poster | Maker of the 350,000th post | Person | rrr's classmate

Offline

**ShivamS****Member**- Registered: 2011-02-07
- Posts: 3,648

But you did not describe your method. Did you just guess?

Offline

**mathaholic****Member**- From: Earth
- Registered: 2012-11-29
- Posts: 3,251

Hmm, I'll describe it. It's in Google Drive, but it's not the whole. I'll upload the files.

Mathaholic | 10th most active poster | Maker of the 350,000th post | Person | rrr's classmate

Offline

**bobbym****bumpkin**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 109,606

Hi mathaholic;

But how about your method?

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**** Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.**

Offline

I've an idea for estimating the population.

1. Develop a highly stinking apple juice.

2. Package it in packets which has your email on it.

3. Use aircrafts from the US Defense to drop these packets everywhere around.

4. The number of complain emails you get is the population of the eartg.

'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'

I'm not crazy, my mother had me tested.

Offline

**bobbym****bumpkin**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 109,606

I would say it would be less than the population of the earth.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**** Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.**

Offline

Alternate method: do not package the appld juice just spill it.

'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'

I'm not crazy, my mother had me tested.

Offline

**bobbym****bumpkin**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 109,606

You could also go around and ask everyone what their favorite color is...

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**** Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.**

Offline

**mathaholic****Member**- From: Earth
- Registered: 2012-11-29
- Posts: 3,251

bobbym wrote:

Hi mathaholic;

But how about your method?

It's here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc … sp=sharing

Mathaholic | 10th most active poster | Maker of the 350,000th post | Person | rrr's classmate

Offline

**bobbym****bumpkin**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 109,606

Hi;

Thanks for the link.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**** Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.**

Offline

The two child policy is the best for the children.

'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'

I'm not crazy, my mother had me tested.

Offline

**bobbym****bumpkin**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 109,606

I think 1.79 children per family is best.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**** Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.**

Offline