Math Is Fun Forum

  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#1 2014-10-06 01:46:48

MogiYagi
Guest

Discrete Mathematics - Reduction / Deduction!

Hi!

I'm having some trouble understanding how I'm supposed to use the reduction and deduction methods.
The question is:


(p → q) ∧ (¬p → r) ∧ ((¬p ∧ r) → s) ∧ ¬q ⇒ s

Prove that this is correct, with the deduction AND reduction method.


I'm fairly new to this kind mathematics, so if somebody could explain and guide me through the answer I would be really grateful!
PS: Excuse the bad grammar (if any), english is my fourth language.

Thanks in advance.

Greetings!

#2 2014-10-06 02:16:55

Olinguito
Member
Registered: 2014-08-12
Posts: 649

Re: Discrete Mathematics - Reduction / Deduction!

is clearly equivalent to just
.

So we have
,
and
.

and
imply

and
imply

So the given implication is correct.


Bassaricyon neblina

Offline

#3 2014-10-07 03:38:20

MogiYagi
Member
Registered: 2014-10-06
Posts: 2

Re: Discrete Mathematics - Reduction / Deduction!

Hi Olanguito and thank you for the reply!

I've done the following:

(p → q) ∧ (¬p → r) ∧ ((¬p ∧ r) → s) ∧ ¬q ⇒ s

1. ¬q (condition)
2. p → q (-II-)
3. ¬p (Modus Tollens)
4. ¬p → r (condition)
5. pvr (equivalence) <=> ¬p ∧ r
6. r (disjunctive syllogism)
7. ¬p ∧ r (conjunction)
8. (¬p ∧ r) → s (condition)
9. s (Modus ponens)

1. q can not be true because ¬q is true.
2. s is false, which means ¬p ∧ r is also false.
3. p is false because q is false.
4. r is true because ¬p is true.
5. ((¬p ∧ r) → is false, which gives us an divergence.

(p → q) ∧ (¬p → r) ∧ ((¬p ∧ r) → s) ∧ ¬q ⇒ s
5.     2.       2.      6.          4.   2.             2.3.1.2
0.     1.       1.      1.          0.   1.             1.0.0.0

To all of this I got the following response:
- Adoption missing.
- The figures in the expression can not keep up with your numbers in the text below.
- Not clear why point 5 and what is the contradiction.
- Conclusion (what is contradicted really?)

Could somebody tell me how I can "fix" these problems. I'm kinda new to the reduction- and deduction methods so I was basically using the notes from my lectures and Google as a reference. Probably why I managed to screw things up. But it looks like I'm halfway to finishing it? Where did I go wrong in my thinking?

Thanks in advance!

Greetings!

Last edited by MogiYagi (2014-10-07 03:42:23)

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB