You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I tested out the last few examples on this page:
Wikipedia Examples
against my calculator, and it came up with
for #1
and for #2:
Why is this?
And isn't the last equation that they have algebraically incorrect anyway, because it doesn't keep the negative sign?
Last edited by Toast (2007-01-24 19:22:33)
Offline
The article is fully correct. For the first example, you copied their final result wrongly.
They had
, which is the same as yours but written differently.For the second, they had
, which is also correct. They differentiated cosx to give -sinx, then they took the negative of that, which is what they said to do in that method that they explained.I have no idea why your calculator wanted a π/180 in there. It looks like it might have been switching between degrees and radians or something.
Why did the vector cross the road?
It wanted to be normal.
Offline
Pages: 1