You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
is there anyway to find an exact value for the following progression:
with a calculator, i get the limit to be 0.739085133215161
is there anyway of finding an exact value for it, i.e. in terms of a mathematical expression, like cos 0.25pi = 1/sqrt(2) etc.
Last edited by luca-deltodesco (2007-02-09 03:54:48)
The Beginning Of All Things To End.
The End Of All Things To Come.
Offline
So L = cos(L). Solving this equation will give you your solution.
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
any idea how i can solve that
The Beginning Of All Things To End.
The End Of All Things To Come.
Offline
You might be able to approximate by rewriting cos x as a Maclaurin expansion, but as you've already got an accurate approximation that probably wouldn't be very helpful.
As for finding the exact answer, I haven't any idea.
Why did the vector cross the road?
It wanted to be normal.
Offline
I'm fairly certain that there isn't one, at least, in the tradition sense. It's like coming up with an indefinite integral for e^(-x^2).
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
Well, I wonder whether the series is convergent. Of course, convergence is given by the question setting because the limit notion is used.
X'(y-Xβ)=0
Offline
That is a good point to bring up George; it seems that we have merely assumed the limit exists and have not addressed the fact that the sequence may "oscillate" too much to converge. So let us determine if {a[sub]n[/sub]} is convergent. Clearly, {a[sub]n[/sub]} is bounded, since for any x ∈ R, -1 ≤ cos x ≤ 1, and thus |a[sub]n[/sub]| ≤ sup{1, |a[sub]0[/sub]|}. Then by the Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem, {a[sub]n[/sub]} has a convergent subsequence. Now I leave the rest of this to someone else, and perhaps I will post a solution soon if no one seems to want to step up to the plate: {a[sub]n[/sub]} is convergent if every convergent subsequence of {a[sub]n[/sub]} has the same limit. Can you prove that this sequence has that property? I am very tired so I may be giving a difficult approach to the problem, but I am confident that it does in fact converge.
If we assume that the sequence does converge, then Ricky's solution is valid, since for any convergent sequence {a[sub]n[/sub]}, any tail of the sequence is also convergent to the same limit; in particular, lim(a[sub]n[/sub]) = lim(a[sub]n+1[/sub]).
Offline
well im not sure if i can prove its convergent, however, i did try it with over 1000 values of x from 0 to 2pi, iterating to a[sub]10000[/sub] and all of them did converge to the same value
The Beginning Of All Things To End.
The End Of All Things To Come.
Offline
convergence just because |an| ≤ sup{1, |a0|}?
|a[sub]n[/sub]| ≤ Max{1, |a[sub]n-1[/sub]|} seems a better reason
if every convergent subsequence of {an} has the same limit.
-first off, we shall list all the convergent subsequences
X'(y-Xβ)=0
Offline
Pages: 1