Math Is Fun Forum

  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#1 2008-02-01 13:40:19

CatherineMorland
Member
Registered: 2008-02-01
Posts: 2

Inequality

Offline

#2 2008-02-01 16:03:02

Identity
Member
Registered: 2007-04-18
Posts: 934

Re: Inequality

CatherineMorland wrote:

I'm going to use Lagrange multipliers (sorry, there's probably a much more elegant way)

Let

And Lagrange multipliers states that for some lambda,

So

And since

, the minimum is 3/2

Last edited by Identity (2008-02-01 16:17:00)

Offline

#3 2008-02-01 18:08:34

CatherineMorland
Member
Registered: 2008-02-01
Posts: 2

Re: Inequality

How do you know it is minimum and not maximum?

Offline

#4 2008-02-01 21:08:33

Identity
Member
Registered: 2007-04-18
Posts: 934

Re: Inequality

It can't have a maximum because as a, b, and c go to infinity, so does the entire expression. That's the only way I can tell roflol

Offline

#5 2008-02-01 22:02:47

CatherineMorland
Member
Registered: 2008-02-01
Posts: 2

Re: Inequality

But

so they can’t all go to infinity.

Offline

#6 2008-02-01 23:23:52

Identity
Member
Registered: 2007-04-18
Posts: 934

Re: Inequality

Oh dear, you're right, I don't really know what then faint

Offline

#7 2008-02-02 01:20:56

JaneFairfax
Member
Registered: 2007-02-23
Posts: 6,868

Re: Inequality

Hence the expression is not bounded above.

As for an alternative approach, how about starting with this:

Then just expand, rearrange, substitute for a+b+c and simplify.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB