Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #51 2012-11-26 02:07:21
Re: Hangman 1A couple of E's? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #53 2012-11-26 02:13:18
Re: Hangman 1Is there a big M? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #55 2012-11-26 02:16:51
Re: Hangman 1How about an S? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #57 2012-11-26 02:50:55
Re: Hangman 1There has to be an A in there? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #59 2012-11-26 03:04:24
Re: Hangman 1Must be a U? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #60 2012-11-26 03:08:01
Re: Hangman 1no.....Tthe words is Ifinit woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto. #61 2012-11-26 03:19:55
Re: Hangman 1Okay, let me have an S. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #62 2012-11-26 03:29:21
Re: Hangman 1Yes woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto. #63 2012-11-26 03:34:20
Re: Hangman 1Is this a name and is there an E? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #64 2012-11-26 03:42:07
Re: Hangman 11.No woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto. #65 2012-11-26 03:49:41
Re: Hangman 1Let's put a couple of T's in there. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #66 2012-11-26 05:12:28
Re: Hangman 1Yes woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto. #67 2012-11-26 05:24:37
Re: Hangman 1Is there an I in there? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #69 2012-11-26 05:38:25
Re: Hangman 1An A maybe? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #71 2012-12-01 09:37:22
Re: Hangman 1√ "The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson #72 2012-12-01 19:05:15
Re: Hangman 1Maybe there is an R in there? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #73 2012-12-07 10:18:41
Re: Hangman 1
correct woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto. #74 2012-12-07 10:20:08
Re: Hangman 1E? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #75 2012-12-07 10:21:21
Re: Hangman 1Is there a T somewhere? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. |