Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
You are not logged in.
#26 2013-01-03 11:33:39
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: square numbeers forever.
julianthemath wrote:
Whoa!
123456789^2=12 345 678 987 654 321
That is not correct.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#27 2013-01-03 11:35:56
- julianthemath
- Super Member
Offline
Re: square numbeers forever.
It isn't? 
Okay!
122=144
Star members have too many stars. So, if I congratulate new star members, so, that means I need more stars for my picture?
#28 2013-01-03 12:30:18
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: square numbeers forever.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#29 2013-01-03 13:07:57
- noelevans
- Full Member
Offline
Re: square numbeers forever.
(((1+i)² )² )² = 16 
Writing "pretty" math (two dimensional) is easier to read and grasp than LaTex (one dimensional).
LaTex is like painting on many strips of paper and then stacking them to see what picture they make.
#31 2013-01-07 07:01:46
- scientia
- Full Member
Offline
#32 2013-01-07 07:19:43
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: square numbeers forever.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#33 2013-01-08 12:07:27
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: square numbeers forever.
**claps for bobbyms Pygathoran theorem!**
**drum roll**
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#34 2013-01-20 11:09:05
- julianthemath
- Super Member
Offline
Re: square numbeers forever.
11111^2=123 454 321
Mathgogocart and I wrote:
omg!
OMG!
Star members have too many stars. So, if I congratulate new star members, so, that means I need more stars for my picture?
#35 2013-01-20 12:46:47
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: square numbeers forever.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#36 2013-04-24 16:51:50
- julianthemath
- Super Member
Offline
Re: square numbeers forever.
22[sup]2[/sup]=16
Star members have too many stars. So, if I congratulate new star members, so, that means I need more stars for my picture?
#37 2013-04-26 10:38:34
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: square numbeers forever.
csc(csc((789))^2=49.9407584569717702
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#38 2013-04-26 12:24:35
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: square numbeers forever.
100 because it is a square in any base.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#39 2013-04-26 18:35:09
- julianthemath
- Super Member
Offline
Re: square numbeers forever.
bobbym wrote:
100 because it is a square in any base.
998001
Star members have too many stars. So, if I congratulate new star members, so, that means I need more stars for my picture?