Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #26 20130103 11:33:39
Re: square numbeers forever.
That is not correct. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #27 20130103 11:35:56
#28 20130103 12:30:18
Re: square numbeers forever.In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #29 20130103 13:07:57
Re: square numbeers forever.(((1+i)² )² )² = 16 Writing "pretty" math (two dimensional) is easier to read and grasp than LaTex (one dimensional). LaTex is like painting on many strips of paper and then stacking them to see what picture they make. #31 20130107 07:01:46
#32 20130107 07:19:43
Re: square numbeers forever.In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #33 20130108 12:07:27
Re: square numbeers forever.**claps for bobbyms Pygathoran theorem!** Hey. #34 20130120 11:09:05
Re: square numbeers forever.11111^2=123 454 321
246 pages on Prime Numbers Wiki (+1) #35 20130120 12:46:47
Re: square numbeers forever.In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #36 20130424 16:51:50
#37 20130426 10:38:34
Re: square numbeers forever.csc(csc((789))^2=49.9407584569717702 Hey. #38 20130426 12:24:35
Re: square numbeers forever.100 because it is a square in any base. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #39 20130426 18:35:09
Re: square numbeers forever.
998001 246 pages on Prime Numbers Wiki (+1) 