Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
You are not logged in.
#576 2013-03-06 09:23:04
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
An L maybe?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#577 2013-03-06 12:34:51
#578 2013-03-17 02:14:21
#579 2013-03-17 06:57:57
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
How about a T?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#580 2013-03-18 11:05:25
#581 2013-03-18 11:07:37
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Is it math?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#582 2013-03-18 11:17:56
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Yes
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
1 point for eachletter
10 points for a guess
bobbym-0
Last edited by mathgogocart (2013-03-18 11:18:09)
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#583 2013-03-18 11:19:56
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Give me an E!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#584 2013-03-18 12:00:34
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
_ _ _ _ e _ _ _ _ _ _ _
bobbym-1
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#585 2013-03-18 12:03:41
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Then let me have an S.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#586 2013-03-18 12:13:28
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
s _ _ s e s _ _ _ _ _ _
bobbym:4
me:0
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#587 2013-03-18 12:30:55
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
How about an O.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#588 2013-03-19 06:12:02
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
s e _ s e s _ o _ _ o _
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#589 2013-03-19 06:15:38
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
How about an N?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#590 2013-03-19 06:18:39
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
s e n s e s _ o _ _ o _
bobbym:7
me:000000.
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#591 2013-03-19 06:21:19
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Must be a T.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#592 2013-03-19 06:43:53
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
no tbobbym:7
me:1
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#593 2013-03-19 06:45:26
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Well then there is a B.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#594 2013-03-19 06:49:27
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
no tbobbym:7
me:2
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#595 2013-03-19 06:50:52
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Could be a W!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#596 2013-03-19 07:25:00
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
no tbobbym:7
me:3
Last edited by mathgogocart (2013-03-19 07:25:43)
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#597 2013-03-19 12:42:12
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
How about a P.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#598 2013-03-20 10:02:37
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
no p.
bobbym:7
me:4
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#599 2013-03-20 12:22:05
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Maybe there is a D.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#600 2013-03-20 12:29:21
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
No D
bobbym:7
me:5.......
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.