Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ π -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

Pages: **1**

**jacks****Member**- Registered: 2012-11-21
- Posts: 77

{A} Total no. of positive integer ordered pairs of

which satisfy{B} Total no. of positive integer ordered pairs of

which satisfyOffline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,485

Hi;

There are 6 ways for 120 and 2 ways for 2013.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**jacks****Member**- Registered: 2012-11-21
- Posts: 77

Thanks Bobbym would you like to explain it to me, Thanks

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,485

Hi;

As far as I know there is no known formula for these problems. The latest work only provides a bound, not an exact answer. These had to be computed for both numbers.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**jacks****Member**- Registered: 2012-11-21
- Posts: 77

Yes Bobbym I need upper bond.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,485

Hi;

Unless I am misunderstanding their paper they have only established an upper bound for

n >= 2r

this is almost useless for your question.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

Pages: **1**