Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ π -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

Pages: **1**

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,605

Hi;

This came up on another discussion group. Here I will show how easy this is to do with mathematica.

**There are 5 different red balls, 5 different green balls, 5 different blue balls and 5 different black balls. In how many ways can they be arranged so that no two balls of same color are adjacent ?**

The whole problem condenses down to this expression. ( I want to thank Robert Israel for showing me this idea.)

This produces an extremely large polynomial in 4 variables. The coefficient of

is the answer. We get it with the extremely powerful command:

Coefficient[ans, w^5 x^5 y^5 z^5]

the answer is 134631576.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 15,397

How does it work?

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,605

It looks like it is the matrix version of a gf. How it works, I never did figure out, but I can use it.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,478

Hi,

I think I got a hang of doing things in J.

Here's a simulation for an approximate answer:

```
sim=: 3 : '0=+/+/(2 4 8 16)=/2+/\(20?20){5#1 2 4 8'
((!20)%(!5)^4)*(+/%#)(sim "0) 1000000#0
```

= 135712661.692608

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,605

Hi gAr;

That is close!

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,478

Hi,

Yes!

Is there any command in Mm to get moving averages?

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,605

M, is bloated to the extreme. There is command for everything. Whenever I do not find a command that does exactly what I want I always think I did not look in the right place!

Try MovingAverage in the help.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,478

Ah, yes!

I should have searched before asking!

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,605

Hi;

No problem. Glad to help.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

Pages: **1**