You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
What is the area of the smallest convex polygon that intersects each of the four branches of y = -2/x and y = 2/x?
Please help thanks
Offline
by intuition i would guess a rectangle with vertices (1,2) (1,-2) (-1, 2) (-1, -2) which gives an area 8units squared
Well actually, you could say 0 is the answer since as x tends to infinity and -infinity it will intersect each of the 4 branches, and hence you'd have a line which has no area
Otherwise the y axis with same argument.
Last edited by luca-deltodesco (2008-05-07 20:10:56)
The Beginning Of All Things To End.
The End Of All Things To Come.
Offline
Thanks luca, I got 8 units squared, but it seemed too easy. I like your solution as x tends to +/- infinity, but are you sure it is valid?
Offline
I see no reason why not.
the 4 regions given by y = -2/x and y = 2/x are all symetrical about the x and y axis. so simply consider the top right region with a rectangle formed between the x and y axis with the origin and the point y = 2/x.
its area will be 4/x², giving the total area of polygon 16/x².
as x tends to infinity, the total area tends to 0
rearrange as x = 2/y. so area is now 16/y^2. as y tends to infinity, total area tends to 0.
The Beginning Of All Things To End.
The End Of All Things To Come.
Offline
You're calculating the area by 2/x * 2/x, when you should be doing it by x * 2/x. This gives an area of two, regardless of what x is, and so the overall area will be 8.
This is true for any rectangle whose vertices lie on the 4 curves and whose lines are parallel (or perpendicular) to the axes.
There might be a smaller polygon if we start considering angled rectangles or heptagons or something.
Why did the vector cross the road?
It wanted to be normal.
Offline
Ok, I'm confused of what to think now... I understand that if you draw an infinitely long rectangle with width 0 then these conditions would be satisfied at infinity, but then that rectangle has area 8 according to mathsy.... so paradox or what?
Also, isn't the rectangle the smallest possible area for this problem? I mean, generally as you increase the number of vertices, extra space is filled so the area goes up.
Offline
Pages: 1