You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I feel so grateful to you for giving me advice.
Now I have put a link to your site from mine.
I have removed a message to install a Japanese language pack.
Please visit my site.
http://www.freewebs.com/keiichi_suzuki/
The above expression was posted to a forum of my homepage from some person.
I deleted the message in my error.
Let x=x(t), y=y(t), z=z(t)
then
xyz = ∫xy(dz/dt)dt + ∫yz(dx/dt)dt + ∫zx(dy/dt)dt
= ∫xydz + ∫yzdx + ∫zxdy
xyz means difference of volume of rectangular parallelepipeds.
I do not know what ∫xydz , ∫yzdx and ∫zxdy means.
The story behind the integral relationship
Please visit below
http://www.freewebs.com/keiichi_suzuki/
Click Bedroom(Profile, etc)
Good night
Yes, it's just a matter of viewpoint.
Thank you
This formula is unnatural from a commonsense standpoint, but this is natural if we look at this carefully.
>
And we can form something like that for definite integrals:
>
Please visit below
http://www.freewebs.com/keiichi_suzuki/math/sekibun0.html
>Looks good, szk_kei, though I haven't checked if it is right or not.
Thank you
Can you see the full explanation of integral relation and property of laurent expansion with an acrobat reader.
Can you see the full explanation of integral relation and property of laurent expansion with an acrobat reader.
http://www.freewebs.com/keiichi_suzuki/
There are some topics in my site.
Taylor Series.
What is the necessary and sufficient condition for the intervals of n of the degree as expressed below ?
f(x)=A0 + An(x-a)^n + A2n(x-a)^2n + A3n(x-a)^3n + A4n(x-a)^4n + +
Please visit my site
http://www.freewebs.com/keiichi_suzuki/
I'm not mathematician.
I'm working for a manufacturer.
My name is Keiichi Suzuki.
I'm a 48-year-old male.
I'm a Japanese.
I publish online mathematics created by myself,
including arithmetic (mathematics) for children.
http://www.freewebs.com/keiichi_suzuki/
My site is listed in
http://dir.yahoo.com/Science/Mathematics/Calculus/
Please visit my site.
Your definition is monotone increasing function passing through the origin and differentiable.
My definition is only differentiable.
When I show an expression without proof, they say always "It can never hold".
When I show an expression with proof, someone says "It is only an application of integration by parts",
someone says "It is simple and beautiful".
y=f(x):differentiable
(xy)'=y+x(dy/dx)
xy+C=∫ydx + ∫x(dy/dx)dx
=∫y dx + ∫x dy
If you want to sea its detail, please visit my site http://www.freewebs.com/keiichi_suzuki/
->[The Study (Mathematics created by myself)]
Relationship between the integral of the function and
the integral of its inverse function
INTGR(y)dx + INTGR(x)dy = xy + C
Please click below.
http://www.freewebs.com/keiichi_suzuki/
I live in Yamagata Prefecture, Japan.
I work for a certain manufacturer as a system engineer and etc.
My name is Keiichi Suzuki.
I'm a 48-year-old male.
I'm a Japanese.
I publish online mathematics created by myself,
including arithmetic (mathematics) for children.
http://www.freewebs.com/keiichi_suzuki/
My site is listed in
http://dir.yahoo.com/Science/Mathematics/Calculus/
Please visit my site.
Pages: 1