You are not logged in.
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions … m21-and-m1
To solve this system of equations - it is necessary to solve the system.
It is necessary to find a parameterization to figurirovallo Pell. It is possible for example to record this.
We need a case of when.
Knowing the first decision
The rest can be found by the formula.
Although this equation can be not enough. We need to find when there are multiple solutions.
http://mymathforum.com/number-theory/33 … -bz-c.html
For Diophantine equation
If the root is integer.
We use the solutions of the equation Pell.
The solution then can be written in this form.
To find all solutions is necessary to solve the more General equation. With different coefficients.
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions … 30#2077030
You can record a similar system.
Parametrization of solutions we write this.
Consider a special case.
Using the solutions of the equation Pell.
Enough to know first, everything else will find a formula.
The solution then write.
These solutions are negative.
And a positive decision of the same are determined by the Pell equation.
Use the first solution.
Next find the formula.
Will make a replacement.
The decision record.
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions … 83#2070383
It turned out the following. For a square shape
If any number of options
and any coefficients . Solutions is always there.Illustrate 2 coefficients. Similarly solved if the number of different factors. That was evident symmetry and do not get confused is better to take 3 equation.
The solution is easy to write.
Here the representation of 3 options, but it is easy to see that can be written in the form of a combination with any number of options.
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions … 26#2069326
For the system of equations.
Solutions can be parameterized.
It is interesting that such triples can be too much. The formula can be increased to any number. That is the same to write not only for 4 partitions, but for any number. The main thing that all the variables were not identical to each other.
http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/comm … mo_problem
Solutions have the form.
https://twitter.com/SeanReeves/status/8 … 1787171840
Using the solutions of the equation Pell.
Solution write.
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/25326 … al-surface
For such systems of equations.
It is better to use an algebraic approach. He gives at once rational decisions.
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions … 50#1965550
For Diophantine equation.
You can record a parameterization.
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/25017 … nal-number
For finding solutions in the case if the square is rational.
Use the same formula. For finding all solutions need to consider all possible solutions of the equation Pell. Consider the case where these solutions exist. To do this, lay on the multiplier coefficients.
And you need to check when this Pell equation has the solutions?
And then the solution is substituted in the above formula.
Consider the case which invited.
; ; ; ; ; ;Use the first solution.
;Then ;
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/24373 … 774#243774
For the system of Diophantine equations.
You can write the parameterization of the solutions.
This means that for every Pythagorean triple has infinitely many solutions.
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions … 65#1826965
For the system of equations .
The solution can be written in this form.
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions … divide-b28
For the equation.
You can write for example the following parameterization.
turn out negative.Will make a replacement. We introduce the number.
We will use the solutions of Pell's equation.
Knowing the first solution i
, you can find the rest on the previous formula.Now knowing this, you can write down the solutions themselves.
can have any sign.The equation from there
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions … n-integers
For the equation.
You can write the solution in this form.
Such a record is better because allows to solve the symmetrical equation with any number of summands. It is only necessary to increase the number of parameters.
One binary form.
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions … ls#1780576
This is Pell's equation and the task is to reduce it to some kind of equivalent.
If you can imagine
Using solutions of Pell's equation.
Decisions can be recorded.
The task from there.
http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/comm … ber_theory
Solution always can be written, for example.
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions … ated-lemma
To describe the solutions of the equation.
I think best would be to describe a solution using
parameters.Use the ideas that basically involve formal and General approach.
But apparently the time has not come for them. Even attempt a discussion and a proposal to solve the equations in General form leads to the opposition.
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/23414 … -equations
Attempt to offer to solve an equation of the form
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions … -and-z-x-y
Write for the equation.
One simple formula.
If you use the solutions of the equation Pell. Where
ask yourself.Make the change.
Then decisions can be recorded.
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/88220 … ct-squares
I think it is better to solve a more formal task. We write the system.
We need to find solutions
- that was an arithmetic progression. This will help the solution of the equation Pell.Knowing any solution of the equation Pell
you can always find the following formula.Having any decision - can immediately write down the solution of this system.
Interesting here is that the
looks like an arithmetic progression.http://math.stackexchange.com/questions … an-squares
It is better to use a more General approach. We write the system.
If the number
, lay at the multipliers. We find then the desired settings.Then the solution can be written as.
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions … y2z2-xyz22
For the equation.
If we use the solutions of Pell equations.
Using my replacement.
Decisions will be.
For the equation.
You can write a fairly simple formula.