Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

John E. Franklin · 2008-01-09 05:10:13

I voted for Dennis because he is the most peaceful, war-free thinker.
Currently 517191 votes are counted in New Hampshire, which is
located between Vermont, Maine and Massachusetts.
1 precinct hasn't reported votes yet from yesterday.
I don't know which town that is.
But 1 out of every 132 people voted for my candidate Dennis.
And out of just the Democrats, 1 out of 72 voted for him.
...
10pm day after vote:
Now the last 301st town has reported its votes (viewable on wmur.com)
This town voted 54 votes democratic and 240 republican, and that's
two separate votes to narrow down candidates in each party.
But now there are 47 and a half more states to vote in the primaries,
mostly in february I think. Wyoming out west did a funny thing last
week; they had a republican caucus, but the democratic vote will be later...
In New Hampshire, on our paper ballot, there is a spot for vice president,
but it is ignored by the entire process and is archaic; funny how traditions
are...

Last edited by John E. Franklin (2008-01-09 15:01:43)

bossk171 · 2008-01-10 02:48:46

I too am from NH, but I voted Obama. I do like Kucinich alot, but I just felt Obama has the greatest chance of making a differance.

Not that it matters, Hilliary took it anyways.

MathsIsFun · 2008-01-10 09:05:53

Obama just missed out ... now it is going to be a very raucous contest.

Maybe I see things strangely, but America does need a change in direction.

bossk171 · 2008-01-10 13:14:53

MathsIsFun wrote:

Maybe I see things strangely, but America does need a change in direction.

Absolutely. I think Obama might just be that agent of change.

MathsIsFun · 2008-01-10 14:55:05

I notice that Kerry has come out in support of Obama ... I wonder if that will make a big difference.

NullRoot · 2008-01-10 21:34:25

MathsIsFun wrote:

Obama just missed out ... now it is going to be a very raucous contest.
Maybe I see things strangely, but America does need a change in direction.

No, I see things strangely; I like Clinton!

On a serious note, though, I'd be interested to see Obama get in. He seems to keen to have everything cleaned up and turned around in the first "18 months" of his term. I would seriously like to see that happen; if it can be done then maybe we'll get presidents who have some expectations to live up to for a while.

bossk171 · 2008-01-11 05:36:20

MathsIsFun wrote:

I notice that Kerry has come out in support of Obama ... I wonder if that will make a big difference.

Not that I'm an expert, but I'd say doubtful. Kerry's regarded as little more than a Joke nowadays.

NullRoot wrote:

No, I see things strangely; I like Clinton!

I like what Hillary stands for, but I don't like the idea of four (or eight) more years of a politician. I feel that she's part of the system now, and in order for us to find change, we need someone who isn't a political robot.

iheartmaths · 2008-01-11 05:46:33

bossk171 wrote:

we need someone who isn't a political robot.

I wonder if that's possible in this country.

bossk171 · 2008-01-11 09:26:18

iheartmaths wrote:

bossk171 wrote:
we need someone who isn't a political robot.
I wonder if that's possible in this country.

I think that'd be Obama (just a little plug for my guy), but I also think that Kucinich and Richardson (who just dropped out) may also be free thinkers.

Definitely not Hillary.

John E. Franklin · 2008-01-12 02:36:15

If someone wins the primary, don't forget you can still WRITE-IN whoever you want on the final ballot in November. Also, the candidates are listed in alphabetical order in New Hampshire, so that could be why we've had C's and B's since 1989 !!

Last edited by John E. Franklin (2008-01-12 02:53:07)

iheartmaths · 2008-01-12 04:27:04

bossk171 wrote:

iheartmaths wrote:
bossk171 wrote:
we need someone who isn't a political robot.
I wonder if that's possible in this country.
I think that'd be Obama (just a little plug for my guy), but I also think that Kucinich and Richardson (who just dropped out) may also be free thinkers.
Definitely not Hillary.

Yeah, I've never been a fan of Hillary. I need to sit down one afternoon and do my research on the canidates since I haven't been paying much attention. Regardless, I know Hillary isn't the one.

MathsIsFun · 2008-01-12 09:57:39

I have a theory that the opinion polls are influencing the votes.

In Iowa they said Obama would lose, so lots of Obama supporters came out and voted. In New Hampshire they said "Obama would win by 10%" so lots of Clinton supporters came out, and some Obama supporters stayed home.

Just a theory.

bossk171 · 2008-01-12 12:00:31

I like your theory.

I was just listening to NPR (National Public Radio) today, and they were making arguments for why they think the polls are a bad thing.

I think another thing that helped Hillary out was the "crying" she did the day before. Alot of people say it humanized her. Frankly, I think it was a planned reaction.

NullRoot · 2008-01-13 11:41:43

I have to admit that didn't help the stereotype some potential voters have of women; about them being emotional. It certainly made me rethink things. Not because she's a woman mind you; I'd just prefer my president didn't cry over trivial things whomever they are. I think it would have done far more for her to appear as a strong woman figure. Like an American Margaret Thatcher.

P.S. I think MiF is on to something!

John E. Franklin · 2008-01-13 19:35:00

It's true. Some of the people I know will only vote for those candiates that they think can win, and they base this on the polls and on the last state caucus. It's insane I tell you.

bossk171 · 2008-01-14 11:58:35

NullRoot wrote:

I'd just prefer my president didn't cry over trivial things whomever they are.

That comment just improved my otherwise dull day.

John E. Franklin wrote:

Some of the people I know will only vote for those candiates that they think can win

I just had this argument with a friend who intended to vote Richardson. I think that we should vote who we think will do the best job. I feel that Richardson and Kucinich (Sorry John E. Franklin) won't do the best job because they'll never get the chance to. They're both great candidates, but have no chance and I felt that voting for them would be wasting my vote, or worse, giving my vote to Hillary.

Ultimately, it's a numbers game, and I think sometimes you have to pick your second choice if it means defeating your last choice.

The good news is that Obama did when in my tiny little town of Barnstead.

John E. Franklin · 2008-01-14 12:13:50

If I travel north, I always miss your town since its not on the main highway.
Someday I'll drive thru it perhaps if I intend to go up the right side of
Winnepasauke, which is very rare. I'm near Keene.
Obama is awesome!! But he might go to Pakistan with an army, and
I prefer to not get involved unless they're at my doorstep.

NullRoot · 2008-01-14 21:55:28

bossk171 wrote:

Ultimately, it's a numbers game, and I think sometimes you have to pick your second choice if it means defeating your last choice.

Candidate A, B, and C are going for the presidency. The predictions are that A gets 37% of the votes, B gets 33%, and C gets 30%. The predictions, however, have an unknown margin of error.

Neither C or B want A to win (for political reasons, of course!). C senses his chances are poor and asks his voters to instead vote for B, creating a boost to B's figures of about 10%.

A, in the mean time, has told his voters that B is actually the favorite to win and they should turn out in higher numbers to ensure he actually clinches the vote. He then cries.

B, however, reveals that he likes horses, long strolls on the beach, Aqua Velva, and an occaisonal cold beer with friends. He cries, too, but only at the end of the Titanic movie.

Who wins the Presidency?

bossk171 · 2008-01-15 02:11:58

NullRoot · 2008-01-15 02:44:07

Correct!

You even alluded to the golden fleece that clogs up the voting machine!

bossk171 wrote:

... in a mess-up of epic proportions...

Bonus points!

MathsIsFun · 2008-01-15 09:10:59

And with this "momentum" idea South Carolina may get to decide the whole thing. If Clinton gets SC she will be hard to beat. Likewise for Obama.

It is all very West Wing.

John E. Franklin · 2008-01-20 06:52:38

Nevada did Republican and Democrat primaries yesterday.
South Carolina only did Republicans; gotta wait till next Saturday for Donkeys.

MathsIsFun · 2008-01-20 10:03:23

Obama seems to be losing now. What a shame ... I think the US needs someone like him, not "more of the same".

bossk171 · 2008-01-20 10:51:48

Just wait, he'll make a comeback.

It's only a matter of time until Hillary does something stupid.

NullRoot · 2008-01-20 21:27:16

...and then curls up in the fetal position and makes a recovery.

Math Is Fun Forum

#1 2008-01-09 05:10:13

Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

#2 2008-01-10 02:48:46

Re: Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

#3 2008-01-10 09:05:53

Re: Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

#4 2008-01-10 13:14:53

Re: Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

#5 2008-01-10 14:55:05

Re: Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

#6 2008-01-10 21:34:25

Re: Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

#7 2008-01-11 05:36:20

Re: Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

#8 2008-01-11 05:46:33

Re: Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

#9 2008-01-11 09:26:18

Re: Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

#10 2008-01-12 02:36:15

Re: Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

#11 2008-01-12 04:27:04

Re: Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

#12 2008-01-12 09:57:39

Re: Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

#13 2008-01-12 12:00:31

Re: Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

#14 2008-01-13 11:41:43

Re: Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

#15 2008-01-13 19:35:00

Re: Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

#16 2008-01-14 11:58:35

Re: Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

#17 2008-01-14 12:13:50

Re: Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

#18 2008-01-14 21:55:28

Re: Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

#19 2008-01-15 02:11:58

Re: Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

#20 2008-01-15 02:44:07

Re: Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

#21 2008-01-15 09:10:59

Re: Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

#22 2008-01-20 06:52:38

Re: Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

#23 2008-01-20 10:03:23

Re: Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

#24 2008-01-20 10:51:48

Re: Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

#25 2008-01-20 21:27:16

Re: Dennis Kucinich loses New Hampshire 2008

Board footer