You are not logged in.
Yes, that is De Morgan's Law and it can be proved with venn diagrams
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Morgan's_laws
Thanks bobbym, that's what I was looking for
Yes, that's also what I had trouble with. It was a homework question for a calculus class that I attended (but wasn't enrolled in). I don't think it should involve complicated algebra since it was only for first year calculus.
Can anyone help me proving that
thanks
I think it is because people today are misguided. We are still trying to shrug off the dogmas that for so long have hindered our progress as a species. It is not science that is to blame, for science is one of the greatest enlightenments the human race has ever witnessed. It is what people do with science - the corrupted thoughts of irrational minds, that forces such evils upon the world.
It is a sad thing, our petty quarrels and egotistical warfare. I don't understand why people can't just love each other instead of fighting and killing. It must be an innate human flaw: that we prefer to manufacture unhappiness and persecute those who are happy.
Mad world.
Just a random idea I was pondering...
If we place a charge q in a vacuum and measure it, the measured charge is less than the actual charge because the vacuum acts like a dielectric - electron/positron pairs are spontaneously created and annihilated, and their presence reduces the observed electric field.
What if a similar mechanism occurred with gravity? What if gravitons/antigravitons spontaneously appear and annihilate, acting as a 'dielectric' material and 'shielding' the source of gravity, so that the observed gravitational field is less than what it should be?
Could this explain why gravity is so weak (of course the shielding would have to be a lot stronger than for electromagnetism)?
I... don't understand
Ah ok, thanks
Give an example of a nonempty subset U of
such that U isI thought the answer would also be a subspace? Why is it not? Thanks
(Ugh I meant nullspace, don't know why I said solution space!)
I was watching an MIT OCW lecture on linear algebra and the guy wanted to find the null space of
After getting it to reduced row echelon form,
The lecturer asks us the 'notice' the identity matrix in the pivot columns, then he writes down:
And since that is in the form
, the solution space must be so thatSo the solution is:
But there are a few things I don't understand about it... to get it into the form of matrix R, you have to swap two columns. Is this allowed?
Also, isn't
a 4x2 matrix? Then how come the solution is written as a linear combination of vectors?That looks fascinating, I'm sorry I can't give much advice but best of luck with it!
Yeah that substitution and expression for dx are correct, but you have to do a bit of algebra before you can get everything in terms of y.
After you sub in x = tan(y), apply a trig identity so that your expression turns into something more usable
exp(x) is just another way of writing
.e = 2.718281828459045...
ln(x) is the natural logarithm of x, and it is the inverse function of exp(x). In other words, it basically does the reverse of what exp(x) does.
The definition goes something like
, thenSince it does the reverse,
Here's my solution, but I don't know if it involves limits in the way you were thinking
Let the number of 5-rupee notes be X, and the number of 10-rupee notes be Y
Since he has 3 more 5-rupee notes than 10-rupee notes,
If the total worth is 195 rupee then
Substituting in,
So he has 15 five-rupee notes and 12 ten-rupee notes.
If 60kg solution contains 20% of salt then there is 0.2×60 = 12kg of salt initially.
If you add x kg of salt, the total weight is (60+x) kg and the amount of salt is (12+x) kg.
So we need:
Solving, we get x = 20, so we must add 20kg of salt.
Let the original length and width in metres of the rectangle be L and W
Length exceeds width by 3m:
If the width is increased by 4m and the length decreased by 6m, let the new length and width be L' and W'.
Now, the area of rectangle with dimensions W', L' is 22 sq m less than the area of the rectangle with dimensions W, L.
And since
,After expanding and simplifying we get:
Then
So the dimensions are 8m by 5m.
nice solution mathsy
I invite 10 couples to a party at my house. I ask everyone present, including my wife, how many people they shook hands with. It turns out that everyone questioned-I didn't question myself, of course-shook hands with a different number of people. If we assume that no one shook hands with his or her partner, how many people did my wife shake hands with? (I did not ask myself any questions.)
very nice
You can use the formula
Where
are the prime divisors of your number, and is their power.e.g.
The sum of the divisors is
When solving
The lecturer says the integrating factor is
But is there a reason why we don't have the log of absolute x, as in
?Thanks
I think this is a bit like asking "What happened before the big bang". There was no 'before' the big bang.
In a similar way, asking "What colour do you see when you die"... well, when we die we don't have the mental capacity to manufacture colour, so it doesn't exist.
After all, our mind creates colors for everything we see, so when our brain dies it makes sense that 'colour' also dies.
Wow, thanks so much rzaidan, I worked through it and got the answer! Thanks again, very nice method
LOL wouldn't want to get stuck underwater, that would be very dangerous