Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ π -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 88,528

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.**

**I agree with you regarding the satisfaction and importance of actually computing some numbers. I can't tell you how often I see time and money wasted because someone didn't bother to run the numbers.**

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 15,597

Sorry,the LaTeX didn't show,so I didn't see your response earlier. It is quite a large number comparing to 1. It is I think around (((3!)!)!)! times greater than 1.

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**circlemaker****Member**- Registered: 2011-04-03
- Posts: 20

The biggest number is outside of our awareness. I would say it's the "awareness barrier" itself, or at least in the middle of it (if it could be measured).

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 15,597

Hi circlemaker

The point of this thread is not finding the biggest numbere there is, which you may know, doesn't exist.

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 88,528

Have you heard of transfinite numbers or mathematics?

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.**

**I agree with you regarding the satisfaction and importance of actually computing some numbers. I can't tell you how often I see time and money wasted because someone didn't bother to run the numbers.**

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 15,597

Of course. But we cannot calculate those numbers in a billion of year let alone half a year or a year.

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 88,528

I do not want to spoil your thread with cross talk but they can be computed. See the lecture by Doron Zeilberger. There is a largest number!

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.**

**I agree with you regarding the satisfaction and importance of actually computing some numbers. I can't tell you how often I see time and money wasted because someone didn't bother to run the numbers.**

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 88,528

Hi;

anonimnystefy wrote:

The point of this thread is not finding the biggest numbere there is

Correct! I will moderate to keep it on track from here.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.**

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,427

60^60^67^890

Hey.

Offline

**noelevans****Member**- Registered: 2012-07-20
- Posts: 236

So let's see if we can post a bigger one; XXXX

XXXX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XXXXXX

XXXXXX

Wow! That's a BIG one!

Could LaTex himself even post as BIG a one?

Writing "pretty" math (two dimensional) is easier to read and grasp than LaTex (one dimensional).

LaTex is like painting on many strips of paper and then stacking them to see what picture they make.

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,427

Thats not a number..... 900!*900!

Hey.

Offline

**noelevans****Member**- Registered: 2012-07-20
- Posts: 236

Hi!

Of course 1 is a number. Aren't most people looking out for #1? That's the most mathematics

that many people want to get involved with. But then again maybe they just haven't found it yet

so they don't think it exists!

Writing "pretty" math (two dimensional) is easier to read and grasp than LaTex (one dimensional).

LaTex is like painting on many strips of paper and then stacking them to see what picture they make.

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,427

1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000008*100000000000000000000000000000000

Hey.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 15,597

Hi noelevans

There are bigger numbers than that in here.

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,427

123!*1528100000000010010101

Hey.

Offline

**mathaholic****Member**- From: Juliania
- Registered: 2012-11-29
- Posts: 2,870
- Website

9.9999999999999999999999999999e+99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999

"What is the square root of 2? 1.4141592653589793238" Seriously, I thought it was that. Too round?

3.141592653589793238...

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,427

9000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000!*8907987876764555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555.

Hey.

Offline

**noelevans****Member**- Registered: 2012-07-20
- Posts: 236

(3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)^(3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

where 3!! means (3!)!, 3!!! means ((3!)!)! etc.

Note that (2!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)^(2!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) = 4 so

there is a bit of a leap from using 2 to using 3 in these expressions.

Writing "pretty" math (two dimensional) is easier to read and grasp than LaTex (one dimensional).

LaTex is like painting on many strips of paper and then stacking them to see what picture they make.

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,427

1000000000000000000000!*12812265731127312371263127370123612381297312803671287126087211897238712731

Hey.

Offline

**mathaholic****Member**- From: Juliania
- Registered: 2012-11-29
- Posts: 2,870
- Website

Graham's number

"What is the square root of 2? 1.4141592653589793238" Seriously, I thought it was that. Too round?

3.141592653589793238...

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 15,597

Let's do my old trick.

, where G is the Graham's number.Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,427

Gramhams Number+666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666667777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777

Hey.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 15,597

Hi mathgogocart

That is not large enough.

And what is that Gramham number?

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**mathaholic****Member**- From: Juliania
- Registered: 2012-11-29
- Posts: 2,870
- Website

Maybe misspelling.

"What is the square root of 2? 1.4141592653589793238" Seriously, I thought it was that. Too round?

3.141592653589793238...

Offline

**Dets65****Member**- Registered: 2013-05-15
- Posts: 7

Are we allowed to use exponents and power?

Offline