You are not logged in.
2691= 2^4 + 3^4 + 3^4 + 5^4 + 5^4 + 5^4 + 5^4 + 13
the +b is just a translation, the hard part is the az. Try polar coordinates.
Vi har och . Om så . .
Det är ett skönt problem. Tack så mycket, Kurre.
Yes that is the trigonometric approach
Good job!
Have you been studying swedish? I think I remember that you wrote that you are interested in languages. Nicely done!
Anyway here is my method:
Reflect AB in the horizontal line and draw line BC as in 2. Now reflect the triangle ABC in AC to make a quadrilateral as in 3. Now, all angles in the quadrilateral ABCD are equal, and all sides are equal, thus it is a square, and since AC is a diagonal,
must be half of a right angle, ieHOW TO READ THAT LANGUAGE??? can translate into english pls? thx
I did translate the important parts of the text:
Find
Altough I should maybe have written that the figure consists of three squares, but that is kind of obvious.
Right?
No. You forget that there is a minus sign. We have 3c<-b. But:
http://g.imagehost.org/0615/3462.jpg
Find
This is an easy problem if you use the standard approach with trigonometry (the problem is for ~17 years old students). But I found a much nicer geometrical method, without using any trigonometry.
So my challenge for you is to find it.
(or solve it any other way without trigonometry is fine too )
Look at mathsyperson proof of the sum of squares:
http://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=18619#p18619
This proof can be generalized so, if you know the formula for all sums with powers up to k, we can express the sum to the power k+1 in the other sums.
Im not following. You cant just substitute expressions for inequalities in other inequalities
\\
Substitute these values into our previous inequality:
The Right hand side is ok, but not the left side. You have:
Il give you some tips. First prove that the first number (4-digit minus reverse) is divisible by 9. We know (or you can prove that too) that a number is divisible by 9 iff its sum of digits is divisible by 9. So when we first add the digits it must be a number divisible by 9. What possible numbers are there?
We first use the cosine theorem on each of the squared sides:
What if one angle is obtuse?
Then we can argue as follows. WLOG we assume
use the formula on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trig_identities#Linear_combinations
I guess he means that, because we assumed that p,p+2 where the largest pair there does not exist any numbers with factors p+2k,p+2(k+1).
As I posted before, this statement is false. (p+2k)*(p+2(k+1)) has precisely those numbers as factors.
hm I meant prime factors, but maybe he does not use that they are prime factors, idk, im too lazy to read through the oproof atm.
There are two different accounts posting here, both RICKisanidiot and RICKYisanidiot, imo a clear violence to the multiple account rule (which I think exist on this forum?)
I'm having a lot of trouble understanding what it is you're trying to go for.
If we suppose that there exist a larger pair of the form p+2k and p+2(k+1) Than the set of numbers that have as factors p+2k and p+2(k+1) must be equal to 0 (since they do not exist).
We are supposing that there exists a larger pair where p+2k and p+2(k+1) are both prime? This doesn't make sense, we've already supposed that p and p+2 were the largest pair with this property.
And you say that the number of integers that have p+2k and p+2(k+1) as factors must be zero. This is false, just look at the number:
(p+2k)*(p+2(k+1))
This number has both those as a factor.
I guess he means that, because we assumed that p,p+2 where the largest pair there does not exist any numbers with factors p+2k,p+2(k+1). IM not sure though and I have not tried to understand the proof either.
I wanted to find a solution that uses the result from problem 3, which took a while and is probably not the easiest one, but here it is anyway:
Thanks for the tips!
Actually I made this thread to see what kinds of programs that existed, since I got the idea to create such a program myself. I have tried Geometers Sketchpad and Cabri now, and Cabri was really nice but was not exactly the type of program I had in mind, altough I guess I will not be able to make a program close as good. But Il maybe give it a try anyway
Are there any good programs for drawing geometrical pictures? I mean that has functions for lets say creating circumcircles, marking centroids/circumcentres/medians etc, basically a program that is designed for creating proofs/problems/solutions in euclidean geometry??
#15let k,n be positive integers, a a nonzero real, k<n+1 . Show that:
edit: i did a mistake so i dont know if its possible to do this using residues, but that does not mean it must be impossible
what do you mean by block walking?
Write it as C(n,0)*C(n,n)+C(n,1)*C(n,n-1)+...+C(n,k)*C(n,n-k)+...+C(n,n)*C(n,0).
Then assume you have a set of 2n persons, and divide it into two sets A and B of n persons in each. Now you want to choose a comittee of n persons. Then for each choice there will be say k persons in set A, and n-k persons in set B, and summing will yield exactly the sum above.
eh how does one define length, width and height for a triangular prism?? :s
sure! it's right
\sum_{k=1}^n \zeta_k^m =0
it does not hold for all m and n