You are not logged in.
I had one which lived with me for three years. I just love them, they are so cute
Hey you guys are pretty smart
Thanks, Jenilia. Visit the 'Games and Puzzles' topic regulalry. I shall post mathematical problems and their solutions which could be of some help to you, for the Olympiad.:)
In this topic, I shall give a problem and give the (proper mathematical) solution after a week.:D
The first one:-
The population of a town increases by 5% annually. If its population in 1995 was 138915, what was it in 1992?
Excellent! You are correct! Tell us how you did it!
If Quasimodo had stumbled upon hidden treasure, then he may have discovered
A contractor agrees to complete a work in 100 days. He engaged 140 men for the job and after doing the work for 60 days, he came to know that only half the work was completed. How many more men should he hire to finish the work in the agreed time?
When there are two numbers x and y, such that both x,y ≥1,
does it follow that y^x is always greater than x^y if x is greater than y?
No.
This is true only if y is greater than a certain CRITICAL Value.
Many years back, I tried to find this critical value of y for certain values of x.
Value of x Approximate value of y
10 1.3712886
100 1.04955
1000 1.0069805
10,000 1.000922309
100,000 1.00011514925
1,000,000 1.0000138158
10,000,000 1.00000161283
100,000,000 1.0000001843
1,000,000,000 1.0000000208
Illustration:- y^100 can be greater than 100^y only if the value of y ≥1.04955
23+18+12+22 is already greater than 30! So, it should be 'people' as pointed out by Mathsy!:)
That's because, in all the odd numbers up to 99,
there are 10 numbers ending in '5'.
5, 15, 25, 35, 45, 55, 65, 75, 85, and 95.
And, when an odd number is multiplied by a
number ending in '5', the resultant always ends in '5':)
1 + 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 + 1/32 + 1/64 + 1/128 + 1/256 + .............1/ ∞ = 2
I cannot think beyond that.
My best wishes to you, Jenilia.
You can post all your mathematical doubts here.
We'd try to help you.
Is it also necessary to prove it for n=1 ?
First, the formula or equation is checked for values like 1,2,3 etc.Only if this test is pased, we asume it is true for an arbitrary number k. Thereafter, if it is proved true for k+1, it becomes a 'proof beyond doubt'.
There once was a boy from Montreal
Who loved to play basketball
For a team he tried out
But if he made it, I doubt
For you see, he was three feet tall!:D
Mathematical Induction is a brilliant way of proving.
For example, the sum of the first n Natural Numbers is
n(n+1)/2.
For n=1, we get 1.
For n=2, we get 3.
Therefore, the summation formula works for 1 and 2.
Let's assume it is true for an arbitrary Natural Number k.
Therefore, the sum of the first k Natural Numbers would be k(k+1)/2.
For k+1, the sum would be k(k+1)/2 + (k+1),
that is [k(k+1) + 2(k+1)]/2, or [(k+1)(k+2)]/2
And, according to the formula we had at the beginning of the proof,
the sum of the first k+1 Natural Numbers would be [(k+1)(k+2)]/2
Since the two are equal, this can be said to be true for sum up to any natural number.
Similarly, it can be proved that:-
the sum 1² + 2² + 3² + 4² +... n² = [n(n+1)(2n+1)]/6
and also
the sum 1³ + 2³ + 3³ + 4 ³ + ......... n³ = [n(n+1)/2]²
I think it is extremely perplexing here quod it is filled with members who smell like feet, but somehow they actually manage to smell differently as I have struggled to climb up lorries, which resemble large...
Hannah,
Mathematics is fun when you try to understand the subject.
Trying to memorize the tables and the formulae may be difficult for some.
Yet, it is easier to get a good score in Mathematics than any other subject.
For example, When you forget what 7x7 is,
try to remember what 7x6 is, then add 7 to the result.
You can get doubts clarified here.
mathsyperson wrote:MathsIsFun wrote:Proofs are just way too strict.
Where did I say that?
Anyway, I agree with me.
Mathematical proof is based axioms and proven theorems, and proofs are viewed throough a microscope.
Euler had claimed x^4+y^4+z^4=w^4 had no solutions;
In 1988, Naom Elkies of Harvard University discovered that
2,682,440^4 + 15,365,639^4 + 18,796,760^4 = 20,615,673^4
Merely testing the first million numbers cannot constitute a mathematical proof!
Maybe, I should have waited for some more days
before giving the solution.
Your reply seems convincing!
I shall take hard copies of your posts,
study them all again, then again,
before finally saying,
"You are right, Mathsy!"
Give me just a few days!
What is a limerick, Mother?
It's a form of verse, said brother
In which lines one and two
Rhyme with five when it's through
And three and four rhyme with each other.
There once was a boy named Reece
He ate and ate until he was obese
He had a big belly
and stuffed it with jelly
and all he wanted for his tummy was peace.
There once was a young boy named Nick
Who by chance was always being kicked
He tried not to fight
For he was smart, kind and bright
So he learned how to run really quick.
There once was an artist named Saint,
Who swallowed some samples of paint.
All shades of the spectrum
Flowed out of his rectum
With a colourful lack of restraint.
There once was a fly on the wall
I wonder why didn't it fall
Because its feet stuck
Or was it just luck
Or does gravity miss things so small?
Speed = Distance travelled / Time taken
Let the distance travelled in 1 circle be C Units.
Speed of A = C Units/hour and Speed of B=6C Units/hour.
I'm not good at proofs, but this is my attempt:
c is a constant, so there is only one value for y.
As shown in the expansion of y109376, the important coefficient will always take the form 2(y*6), because 6 is always the last digit. This means that this proof can be carried forward for any point on the chain of the magic number.[/proof]
There's probably a flaw in there somewhere, could someone check it please?
I am unable to find any serious flaw, yet,
I am not fully convinced.
I shall try with a much simpler number, viz. y76.
y76 is (y*10^2)+(7*10^1)+(6*10^0).
When this number is squared,
[This is of the form (a+b+c)²
which is equal to a² + b² + c² + 2ab + 2bc + 2ac]
we get
10000y² + 4900 + 36 + 14000y + 840 + 1200y
which is the same as
10000y² + 15200y + 5776
From this, it is clear, for any y belonging to Natural Numbers,
the last two digits are not affected. They continue to be 76.
But, does this conclusively prove there exists a value y such that
the last three digits of y76² are y76?
Mathsy, I am confused.
... oh no, will he ever catch A?
Reminds me of Zeno's Paradoxes!
B is faster than A and would get past him eventually!
We are only interested in the 10^6 coefficient of the square of this. That will be equal to 2(y*(6*10^0))+a constant made up of the expansion of the other powers of 10, but that does not involve y.
So, the 10^6 coefficient is 12y+c, which should only be equal to y for one value of y.
We are only interested in the last digit of 12y+c, so it can be called 2y+c without affecting our purposes. However big c is, it can also have all of its digits except the last removed.
Mathsy, how did you get '2(y*(6*10^0))+a constant made up of the expansion of the other powers of 10, but that does not involve y'?
Consider giving a link to the calculator on the Index page,
since not many may be aware, when the link is in this forum.