You are not logged in.
Okay, I admit I am a Real procrastinator.
Here is the last demonstration for zealots in the slide rule:
Shifting the LL's
Click "Flip to the other side"
We have already learned how to use a slide rule to guage exponentials, roots and logarithms. But again like the multiplication, we have the "off-scale" problem because of the result might be too large or too small.
Just to think to calculate 2 raised to 3, or the cubic root of 8. The result for the former is 8, not in the scale LL2+ where 2 stays, because it's too large. (The largest value on LL2+ is e, approximately 2^1.44<2^3) And the result of the latter is 2, not in the same scale LL3+ where 8 stays.
To illustrate, let's focus on the 2^3.
Knowing that LL3+ is only LL2+^10 and use either formulae below:
Using the first formula:
LL2+: 2 <a>
C: 3<d> right 1(10)<c>
LL3+: 8<e> 1 M<b>
Logically a-b-c-d-e, and e is the result
Using the latter formula:
LL2+: 1.232<d> 2 <a>
C: 3<c> right 1(10)<b>
LL3+: 8<e>
a-b-c-d-e
BTW: e-d-c-b-a is the route to get the cubic root of 8
The last tip: for more accurate results for something like 3^7.8, you can split the exponent to a sum, like 7.8=2.8+5 and then multiplicate the splitted power, like 3[sup]2.8[/sup]×3[sup]5[/sup].
Hope you have a wonderful time with your own slide rule. Hope you love it!
The End
I don't have anything= I have nothing.
The latter setence uses the concept of vanity(nothing) although the same meaning.
wasee you know what? Your idea is quite the same as that of the Ancient Roman people.
How to record not having any amount? Simply not writing down anything.
So they don't have 0, and they only have numbers that stands for some amount real, concrete.
However, the Ancient Indians, had a different idea.
Not any = 0. 0 means vanity. Vanity has something to do with the Ancient Indian philosophy. The concept of vanity, not any thing, is a critical part in the philosophy.
So they are the creators of the 0.
And 0 simply means no value.
Looks like abundant rubbish.
But when you have 23-3, you will realize the very usage of it. It can be used with other concrete values together to create a simpler expression.
So when you ask about where an empty set is useful,
I can tell you it can have relationship with other sets, like A and Empty is Empty, A or Empty is A, etc.
length, width
l=1.5w
then how about the hight? Okay, set it as h.
then we know that 4(l+w+h)=6
so 2.5w+h=1.5
Now we wanna maximize V=1.5w w h just under the condition of 2.5w+h=1.5.
The simplist way to do this is to gimmikly apply an inequality
We know that for a, b and c
and that
and that
the equality stands in previous two when a=b=c.
"abc" in the the second clause is more or like volume formula.
let's see 1.5w w h ....... a=1.5w, b=w, c=h--------wait! a and b can never be equal in this way, meaning we cannot find the very maximum point in this way.
However, there is another way, the smart way. Watch this:
a= b=1.25w and c=h.
Then
V= (1.5/1.25²) 1.25²w²h≤ (1.5/1.25²) ((2.5w+h)/3)^3
the equality stands when 1.25w=1.25w ( definately) =h
The maximum volume is then 1.5/12.5=0.12 when w=0.4 and h=0.5, and of cause, l=0.6:D
Ok, say goodbye to all forms of calculus, real analysis, complex analysis, topology, ZFC set theory, many parts of field theory, game theory, and the like. You just eliminated half of maths, much of which have important results in solving real life problems that we no longer know how to solve.
Edit: George Y... welcome back to the 16th Century.
Don't exaggerate, Ricky. A finite system admitting the last error isn't that uncapable.
"mikau, your book should give you steps to produce such results"
I want to say the same words. The procedure you want is only routine, and your book should just contain it.
"How do we fix this problem George? How do we solve my proposed problem? "
Simple, dump the whole trick of Reals.
For sore throats......
It reminds me of a glass of hot brandy to cure cold in Sherlock Holmes.
If you set N30° as possitive, then S30° can be regard as -30°. I guess this negative 30° is true.
You mean you always make mistakes during the calculation?
Then you have to watch all the entries (usually 3) in one row and imagine doing the scaler product simultaneously.
Ricky, you should distinguish between something intuitive and something logical.
You may not accept an intuitive perception, but you have to accept a logic one.
The 0 probability here either means possible or impossible, some chance or no chance at all. Not a third choice, only yes or no. That's how logic works.
If you just vaguously avoid talking about either case and try to ban the discussion, you are not reasoning but trying to make arbitary rules.
It will be a great pity for maths to be arbitary and illogical.
BTW:
1)A has no B.
2)A has some B.
Logically, if one in 1) and 2) is False, the other must be True.
This applies to any A and B(universal), such as A=" the event occuring on some moment" , B= "probability"
I rather obey the universal rule of logic.
It can be negative regarding directions.
N-S E-W Clockwise-CounterClockwise
The probability of each point must be 0, because if it was any other real number than 0, the sum of the of probabilities would be infinite.
Yes, hence the probability is 0, meaning not any probability. If any, the sum of all the probabilities would be infinite.
How do you conceive not any probability? -I interpret it as no chance at all, impossible. No matter how many trials you have, you cannot make it happen once, otherwise the probability of the event cannot be 0.
Then why again and again these "impossible" things just happen in real life? -You get up every morning, Ricky.
Guess you have some error in using Excel.
It's simpler than you thought:
kurtosis = ∑(xn - MeanX)[sup]4[/sup] / (StdX[N-1][sup]4[/sup]* (N-1))
∑(xn - MeanX)[sup]4[/sup] =16+1+0+1+16=34
Var[5-1]= (4+1+0+1+4)/4=10/4 (=1.581139[sup]2[/sup])
Stdev[5-1][sup]4[/sup](5-1)= (10/4)[sup]2[/sup]*4=10*10/4=25
So Kurtosis=34/25=1.36
[img]http://.......jpg[/img]
I didn't upload it, I linked an image from somewhere else
Kurtosis = -1.2
Wrong-a kurtosis cannot be negative
You've been so patient Janefairfax.
So what 0 probability exactly mean in a continuous system, Ricky?
0 means some probability?
Then how much?
infinitesimal?
Or a small one?
How small?
No matter how small it is, it has some, then the total probability on infinite points is Infinity. Because
c(infinity)=infinity.
So may be the best interpretation of 0 is infinitesimal, right? good answer.
tan25 =
*120=
-15=
the answer
What? ......
That tough?
I mean, alcohol inside a chocolate, sometimes rum, sometimes vodka...
To illustrate the last sentence:
C: 1 3
D: 1.1 3.3
LL3+: 3 27
e[sup]1.1[/sup]=3 and e[sup]3.3[/sup]=27;
1.1/3.3=1/3
Okay, the final part.
Finding logs, roots and using LL shift.
C 1 3
LL3+ 3 27
b c
a d
if you follow the a-b-c-d sequence find 3 first and slide to find 1 to match 3 below, then 3 on the right, last 27 as the result of 3^3
But if you follow the sequence of a-b-d-c, you get log[sub]3[/sub]27 in the end.
And if you follow the sequence of d-c-b-a, you get 27[sup]1/3[/sup] in the end.
That's how simple logs and roots work. Just keep in mind that the D-value represents the exponent to whom e or other can be raised to generate the value on LL , and C-value-pairs represents the ratio between the two exponents on D.
but how many rules are there you have to remember?
I enjoy your contributions, George, they make me think harder about continuous vs discrete.
Thanks, glad you are one of my first readers.:)