You are not logged in.
Well, krassi...I think its safe to say that none of us came up with an answer and I've been really wanting to see the solution...
So can you post it, please?
d) 10 numbers on a phone keypad (???)
l) 3 little pigs and the big bad wolf
Here's what I've got....there are still two that I cannot get:
Alaska
Thailand
Trinidad
--------------->acguinaar
Australia
--------------->risacfoauht
Denmark
Bulgaria
Ethiopia
Honduras
Afghanistan
Liechtenstein
I know, but I don't know how we could have helped her without seeing the puzzle...
who's "gusy"? (just kidding)
What level calculus and geometry?
do you mean that it is just one blank 9 x 9 square?...
If so, you could just rotate the numbers:
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1
3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2
4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3
etc...
Oh, and I forgot...the point of my post...
I remember learning threes and twelves from Schoolhouse Rock...(this may be too old for most of you to remember, but they sell cd's at record stores)
So, one option is learning in singsong!
It is a really easy way for your brain to remember...
LOL...
And Irspow, that website was very interesting...how long did it take you to become comfortable with that system?
We may not teach it in schools because it is not really a universal way that people learn things (that's not to say that any one universal way even exists)...For example, it is easier for me to just memorize a phone number than it would be for me to memorize a sequence of words that represent the number in my mind...
hey krassi-
I'm still waiting to hear what rom is...
I'm a pick-up truck kind of girl, in real life...
But from your list, I have to say that the Shelby is a lovely car...
Hmmm...
Rod, as in Rodney?....Roderick?...Rodruigo?....
I'm not sure if I am answering your question correctly because I don't understand what the company-wide sales has to do with it...But based solely on your sales at Store 1:
In 2003, Store 1 made 354% of the previous year (254% increase), in 2004, a 51% increase and in 2005, a 10% increase...
So from 2002-05, it looks like a total increase of 491%...
But this is mainly due to the huge increases you saw in 2003. It appears as though they are leveling off, but I do not really know how to predict what to expect in the next three years. Probably 0-10% on the previous year.
OMG, no I did not until right now...
I guess the teacher uses the same worksheets every year!
OMG that was too funny....
I'm going to be saying that all day...
"some people are being fangoriously devoured by a gelatinous monster"
Anyhow, Mikau you seem to be a very personable, bright young man...It is unfortunate that you feel as though your personal relationships are a disaster...Have faith (I do!) that you will be able to establish some relationships with people who can appreciate your interests, even if they do not share them...
oh my, I see....the exact same worksheet...
Well, MathsIsFun gave the only answers that I can think of (above)
What Are The Shapes That They Are Asking About?
when you take the square root, you need the ± which gives you a few different combinations...this "proof" just uses one combination that does not work.
Here's what I've got:
Max: .2s + .25m (OBJECTIVE FUNCTION)
subject to: (CONSTRAINTS)
s + m ≤ 70
s ≤ 50
m ≤ 30
s,m ≥ 0
Then, it sounds like you are using the Corner Point Theorem (I am assuming, since you asked for vertices). So you would just graph the above constraints to find the feasible region, and then evaluate the objective function at each of the corner points:
Corner points (Vertices):
a = (0,0)
b = (50,0)
c = (0,30)
d = (40,30)
e = (50,20)
So evaluating your objective function at all of these points yields a maximum profit at corner point d=(40,30):
Max (C?) = $15.50 per day
with Snickers=40 and M&Ms=30
I hope that made sense....let me know if anything is unclear.
ummmm...okay, just a shot in the dark...
on his checks?
probably....if you listen to click and clack
I agree, except that I believe that a cuboid may have 9 planes of symmetry...
3 that run perpendicular to the sides (in each direction)
and then 6 that cut through the diagonal for each side.
I don't think that you stated it explicitly, (and it is probably sort of obvious) but you MUST, first and foremost, have closure under the operation for any kind of group to exist....
flatulant 13 year old...did that make sense?
And where are you that you are learning group theory in middle school!?
Okay, my turn to ask for help....
Can someone explain how you would go about computing the Galois Group for
x^4 - 16
I really am not quite understanding the process...
looks okay to me...:)
I'm a little rusty on my probability theory and I don't want to give you the wrong answer, so you may want to see what someone else says...
but I think that the conditional probability would only come into play if the previous events have some sort of impact on the upcoming ones...That is, I think you ought to be able to look at the next 16 tosses as a totally new series of events and so that each toss still has the very same 50/50 probability.