Math Is Fun Forum

  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#27 Re: Help Me ! » Argand graph » 2009-04-04 08:13:22

Draw two lines, one pi/3 anticlockwise from the positive real axis, and one pi/3 clockwise. Shade in the middle.

#28 Re: Euler Avenue » Number theory » 2009-04-01 10:28:02

Nice smile

I like the combinatorial proof of Fermat's Little Theorem, which considers the number of bracelets that can be made from 'p' beads of 'a' different colours.

#29 Re: Help Me ! » Probability » 2009-03-31 09:26:52

ARGH. I misread the question. I thought the E=mc^2 sweat-shirt can be worn on all weekdays, regardless of the trousers.

Thanks mathsy.

#30 Help Me ! » Probability » 2009-03-31 08:33:54

Daniel123
Replies: 2

Each day I choose at random between my brown trousers, my grey trousers and my expensive but fashionable designer jeans. Also in my wardrobe, I have a black silk tie, a rather smart brown and fawn polka-dot tie, my regimental tie, and an elegant powder-blue cravat which I was given for Christmas. With my brown or grey trousers, I choose ties (including the cravat) at random, except of course that I don't wear the cravat with the brown trousers or the polka-dot tie with the grey trousers. With the jeans, the choice depends on whether it is Sunday or one of the six weekdays: on weekdays, half the time I wear a cream-coloured sweat-shirt with E=mc^2 on the front and no tie, otherwise, and on Sundays (when naturally I always wear a tie), I just pick at random from my four ties.

a) This morning, I received through the post a compromising photograph of myself. I often receive such photographs and they are equally likely to have been taken on any day of the week. However in this particular photograph, I am wearing my black silk tie. Show that, on the basis of this information, the probability that the photograph was taken on Sunday is 11/68.

I get 3/14, and I can't see where I've gone wrong. Can anyone confirm the question's answer?

Thanks smile

(I appreciate it's long, but it's pretty straightforward and shouldn't take long)

#31 Re: Exercises » Guided exercises » 2009-03-31 06:52:33

I did this question quite recently.

#32 Re: Help Me ! » Fibonacci paper » 2009-03-29 07:16:04

It interested me to the extent that my bath overflowed whilst reading it.

My english teacher would shoot me if I handed anything like this in, though.

Well done smile

You've added a "b" at the end of "continuing" on the seventh page.

#33 Re: Help Me ! » Help. (groups) » 2009-03-25 06:59:02

"but the poor reader is not prepared for this"

what a strange book.

#34 Re: Help Me ! » Matrices » 2009-03-24 11:10:14

Okay, thanks to both of you. Stupid book.

#35 Help Me ! » Matrices » 2009-03-24 08:29:40

Daniel123
Replies: 7

It's given that:

a) Show that

, and hence find
.

b) The matrix C satisfies the equation

. Find p, q, r such that the image of
under the transformation represented by
is

I've done the first bit, and got

, which I know is correct.

For the second part, the quickest way I can think to do it is to find (B+I)^2 - BI, then find its inverse and postmultiply by (p,q,r). Is this the best way?

Thanks.

EDIT: Actually, using my above method, I end up with

, which would imply that
doesn't exist?

#36 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » Tsk tsk for British parents » 2009-03-19 10:43:46

lightning wrote:
Daniel123 wrote:
JaneFairfax wrote:

The true figure is 43.5 hours.

I'd estimate that I'm on the internet for over double that per month, though much of it is productive.

Same. c(=

I probaly spend half here and half on ACC... and a quarter on UniCreatures. o_O

#37 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » Tsk tsk for British parents » 2009-03-19 09:12:22

MathsIsFun wrote:

But I do remember a time when I would stay up for hours on Doom or Quake. Fond memories.

Things like that can be so addictive. I'm glad I got out of playing a certain game, which was eating up about 5 hours of my day (just in playing time, not including thinking about it dizzy )

#38 Re: Dark Discussions at Cafe Infinity » Tsk tsk for British parents » 2009-03-18 10:56:19

JaneFairfax wrote:

The true figure is 43.5 hours.

I'd estimate that I'm on the internet for over double that per month, though much of it is productive.

#40 Help Me ! » Integral » 2009-03-17 09:04:47

Daniel123
Replies: 1

I ended up having to do this by finding a reduction formula for

.

Is there another way?

Thanks.

#43 Re: This is Cool » Wolfram Alpha » 2009-03-08 09:41:22

Hmm...

I doubt it will work as well as the article makes out.

Would be great though.

#44 Re: Puzzles and Games » Conundrums » 2009-03-07 01:54:39

I find these harder than the other parts of "Countdown", as my brain focuses on the words already formed.

#45 Re: Help Me ! » ??? » 2009-02-26 07:33:02

Thus we have proven that I am an idiot.

Thanks luca smile

#46 Help Me ! » ??? » 2009-02-26 07:26:40

Daniel123
Replies: 2

I have a pair of simultaneous equations. The solution I have solves them by 'inspection'. Fair enough. Why can't I solve them by substitution? I can't get it to work.

The solution says "by inspection, A = - 2, B = 0". When I use substitution, I can't get these answers.

Thanks.

#47 This is Cool » Quartic Formula » 2009-02-25 12:23:57

Daniel123
Replies: 2

http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/QuarticFormula.html

I feel almost as bad for the person who typed it up in LaTeX as the person who worked it out.

#48 Puzzles and Games » Plates » 2009-02-23 11:59:27

Daniel123
Replies: 2

100 floor tower. 2 identical plates. How many times do we have to drop a plate to find the minimum floor from which dropping a plate will cause it to smash?

#49 Re: Help Me ! » Power Set Algorithm » 2009-02-07 08:43:22

George,Y wrote:

Are you arguing that such a ratio cannot exist?
Yes I do dude. Seeing is not believing. Please read my post in "This is cool" and you will find my argument that the existence of a circle in not testified or verified by science discoveries so far. And read my recent disproof that infinite decimals has its consistency problem.

I think you're misunderstanding what mathematics is. Science has absolutely no relevance to maths; the concepts we deal with in maths are all hyopthetical. Of course a perfect circle could not exist in our universe, but it does exist in the hypothetical, mathematical universe that we have created, and therefore so does pi.

#50 Re: Help Me ! » How do you solve this? » 2009-02-07 07:36:58

JaneFairfax wrote:

Are you sure, Jane?

Plot of x^2+2x vs 2^x+3

n>5 also works.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB