You are not logged in.
Thanks for posting this up
Can you exaplin in a little more depth what this means?:
Ok, so I asked a tutor about this question today and was told not to bother with it (apparently an older version of the question sheet had been posted up & it was incomplete)
This is the new one:
Is this statement valid?I've worked a little on it before getting stuck at:
What do I do with h?
Do i make it du=hdx
Okay, so this then?
As in this?
and then add in the limits?
Not really understanding what you mean by that
okay. So sub u=x-2, so it's h(u) and take 3 out to the front?
Where would I go from there?
More integral questions...
So, I think I know what to do overall (apply the properties of integrals to the second expression and then sub in 5 for h(x) ) not too sure how to get there though.
Do I start off with this?
Thanks!
I've tried a number of equations for the above statement, and from the answers I get it seems like it's true?
If it is true, is there any theory that I can use to explain the statement?
Thanks
I managed to simplify it to get the answer
Thankyou Got the right answer
So I used the product rule; then applied it all to the chain rule and got
i.imgur.com/McRIMWE.png
having trouble with simplifying it though
Okay, so not the complete answer, but am I going in the right direction?
and then apply the chain rule?
whereActually, not the chain rule.
Would I use the quotient rule?
Edit: wait. I'll stick with the chain rule I think I might know how to solve this. I'll post the answer in a bit.
Okay, sorry it's been a long day. I just realized that the working out I put up was for a different question too
Whoops, there's a typo in the question; it's supposed to be
Could I still use the chain rule?
Sorry, hopefully this is more clear (the question, with some of my working out)
i.imgur.com/VyT9EPC.jpg