You are not logged in.
There are several examples in the book, which there is no distance and bearing of locations provided,
But the book has the answer by using trigonometry to solve, but the book says it could be solved by vector approch as well. I will post another example of such problem.
There several examples in the book, which distances and bearings was not provided, one example is what above.
This how I solved it:
vector AB = (8km, 030 digrees).
Vector BC = (10km, 000).
I use 000 digrees, as the bearing from B to C, because it not provided.
Vector AB = (8cos60) = 8 * 0.5 = 4.
(8sin60) = 8 * 0.8660 = 6.928
Vector BC = (10 cos000) = 10 * 1 = 10.
(10sin000) = 10*0= 0.
To find distance, Vector AC = AB + BC.
AC = 4 + 10 = 14.
6.928 + 0 = 6.928.
By Pythag.
AC^2 = 14^2 + 6.928^2
=243.99. taking root
=15.620.
Bearing from North I had, 153.671.
Please, help me.
I had:
(a) 320km.
(b) 263 digrees.
I think I am right. I used vector approach to solve.
I tried using vector approach to solve the following, but got it wrong, please help.
A cyclist starts from a point A travel 8 km in the distance 030 digrees to B and then 10 km to C. Find the cyclist's distance and bearing from A.
I had: x^2-1/x^3 -2x^2 +x.
I dont understand how you got -x^2 +1. As the numerator.
Please, let me know how you got it.
Thanks
Okay I would try and do thanks.
Please I want to follow the procedure before getting the answer, the book gave me exactly your answer, but the workings was not shown.
Thanks once more.
Errr okay, I see!
But Sirs please solve for me.
Thanks in advance.
An aeroplane flew from town A, travels 200km at a bearing of 135 digree to town B. Then travels 250km from town B at a bearing of 045 digree to town C. Find using the vector approach
(a) the distance of A from C.
(b) the bearing of A from C.
Please solve this problem for me.
Thanks in advance.
This is how the top right bracket looks: (x^1/2 - x^-1/2) The last X raises to the power negative one over two(x^-1/2).
Thanks.
Simplify the following:
Please help me solve this. (x^3/2 + x^1/2) (x^1/2 - x^-1/2)/(x^3/2 - x^1/2)^2. I got x^2 - x + x/x^3 - x^2 - x^2 as the final answer. The book has x + 1/x(x - 1) as its answer which I don't comprehend. The book did not show the procedures.
Thanks in advance.
= grouping like terms > 4m^2 - m^2 + 6mk +6mk - 2mk - 2mk + 9k^2 + 4k^2 This is where the mistake is.
-(m^2 - 2mk -2mk + 4k^2) = -m^2 + 2mk + 2mk - 4k^2[/b]
This is -1 times the bracket, so every term changes sign.
Thank you very much indeed Sir!
Errrr! That was where the mistakes stem from, candidly speaking I had thought, I one has to take off the bracket, after multiplication has taken place within the bracket.
I have now grown wary to multiply any sign outside the bracket after multiplcation has taken place within the bracket, especially negative signs.
Thanks Sir for the provision of the link, God bless.
(2m^2 + 3k)^2 - (m - 2k)^2 . Please see how I solved it, and correct where I have made the mistakes so that I could identify it. Please.
Here I go:
(2m + 3k)^2 - (m - 2k)^2 = (2m + 3k)(2m + 3k) - (m - 2k)(m - 2k) . by expansion.
= Multiplying the first expansion > (2m + 3k)(2m + 3k) = 4m^2 + 6mk + 6mk + 9k^2.
Multiplying the second expansion > (m - 2k)(m - 2k) = m^2 - 2mk - 2mk + 4k^2.
= (4m^2 + 6mk + 6mk + 9k^2) - (m^2 - 2mk - 2mk + 4k^2)
= grouping like terms > 4m^2 - m^2 + 6mk +6mk - 2mk - 2mk + 9k^2 + 4k^2
= adding them > 3mk^2 + 12mk - 4mk + 13k^2
= 3mk^2 + 8mk + 13k^2.
Please this is how I got my answer, I know I am wrong but I cant help.
I have understood #38 very well, but please, see how I came by that final answer, I have tried to understand how you solved it at #19 but still I haven't grasp it.
![]()
I got:
3m^2 - 8km + 13k^2, Which is impossible for me to split the middle term.
Please help.
Errr sir, that's good, so always to check, should I pick the numbers randomly in my head to do the substitution? To see if will get (0) as result for both? Or the figure I will get should be the same in each case? And not necessarily (0)?
hi Ebenezerson
I think you'll need to multiply these brackets out like this
Then you can start to simplify.
Can you fill in the dots ?
Alternative way to do this:
difference of two squares:
Have you met this before ?
If so, you could put p = 2m + 2k and q = m - 2k
Bob
Sir this one, I tried resolving it my self with my understanding, but got different result, please I would be much obliged if you would take the pain to explain it to my understanding once more by manipulating each step. Please.
The book gave this as the final answer:
(2a - 3b - c)(2a - 3b '- C')
I don't understand how it got the '-C', I think it should be '+C' instead.
What do you say?
4a^2 - 12ab - c^2 + 9b^2
= 4a^2 - 12ab - 9b^2 - c^2
= 4a^2 - 6ab - 6ab + 9b^2
= 2a(2a - 3b) -3b(2a - 3b)
= (2a - 3b)(2a - 3b) = (2a - 3b)^2.
------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------
(2a - 3b)^2 - c^2 = (2a - 3b - c)(2a - 3b + c). Is the final answer correct?
At first, I did not spot that this is the difference of two squares. But then I noticed that (q^2 - 6qr + 9r^2) is a perfect square:
So try this:
put P = 3p and Q = (q - 3r) and use
Bob
Last but not the least could you help me with an illustration, how you got the (q - 3r)^2 ?. :-)
![]()
Okay sir! but could you explain with an illustration, how you got the (q - 3r)^2 ?
In #19.
Thanks in advance.
Please an assistance, please and why it should appear.
Candidly speaking sir, I cant tell or explain why that negative sign should appear there, to be frank!
Whenever I am dealing with such complicated difference of two squares, positive and negative signs eludes me just in the end.
= (3p)^2 - (q- 3r)^2
= (3p - q - 3r)(3p +q - 3r).
Is that correct?
But please help me solve the third and the fourth ones.