Math Is Fun Forum

  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#76 Re: Help Me ! » Really, really quick » 2009-01-17 00:41:11

Ricky wrote:

Just wanted to note that stating the sum converges because 1/n^2 does is rigorous.

Ahh right, okay. I thought I might have to write out some |a_n| < |b_n| things mentioned on that wiki page.

Thanks smile

#77 Re: Help Me ! » Really, really quick » 2009-01-16 09:52:54

I don't even know why I asked this, it obviously converges.

#79 Help Me ! » Really, really quick » 2009-01-16 09:37:04

Daniel123
Replies: 6

Is it okay to (unrigorously) state that

converges because
does?

Thanks.

#81 Re: Help Me ! » Radians and Proof Question » 2009-01-16 07:25:19

Draw a diagram. Draw a radius from O to A and from O to B. Let the radius be of length r.

The area of the larger part is equal to the area of the larger sector + the area of the triangle AOB.

The area of the smaller part is equal to the area of the smaller sector  - the area of the triangle AOB.

Remember that the area of a sector is

and the area of a triangle is
(where a and b = r here).

Also note that the angle of the large sector = 2pi - theta.

#82 Re: Jokes » Quotes from Cambridge » 2009-01-15 09:20:17

lightning wrote:

i dont get these jokes, what do they mean?

There are rather a lot. Choose one and we'll explain?

#83 Re: Help Me ! » Prove » 2009-01-14 11:06:42

I see.

Thank you Jane. I don't like square one hmm

#84 Re: Help Me ! » Prove » 2009-01-14 09:52:49

A, B and C are three angles in a triangle, though? Why can't we order them arbitrarily?

#85 Re: Help Me ! » Prove » 2009-01-14 08:54:02

It was stated in the initial conditions that x,y,z > 0.

Why does that initial assumption lose generality though?

#86 Re: Help Me ! » Prove » 2009-01-14 07:24:42

Okay, I've got it.

WLOG let

, with k>0 and where A, B and C are the three angles of a right-angled triangle.


From my post above, we see that:

WLOG let

  and thus let

In this interval, tanC is increasing

#87 Re: Help Me ! » Prove » 2009-01-14 04:39:44

Using the identity for tan(A+B), I managed to get:

When arctanx + arctany + arctanz = pi, x + y + z - xyz = 0 ⇒ x+y+z = xyz

Not entirely sure where to go from here, as you cannot say that A < B ⇒ tanA < tanB.

#88 Re: Jokes » Quotes from Cambridge » 2009-01-13 08:52:41

lightning wrote:

LOL - tesco... HA!

lightning wrote:

Lol - More... - Less... Roflol!

These aren't the jokes!

#89 Re: Jokes » Quotes from Cambridge » 2009-01-13 08:43:24

I suggest clicking "more" at the top of the page.

#90 Re: Jokes » Quotes from Cambridge » 2009-01-13 08:17:44

My favourite is probably: "Any theorem in Analysis can be fitted onto an arbitrarily small
piece of paper if you are sufficiently obscure."

#94 Re: Formulas » Algebra Formulas » 2009-01-10 02:41:49

A useful algebraic identity:

#95 Re: Help Me ! » Why does factoring work with limits???? » 2009-01-10 02:38:57

Until you're at the stage of understanding the rigorous definition Jane mentions above, think of getting an answer like 0/0 as 'we can't get the answer this way, as 0/0 is not defined. It could really be anything'.

#96 Re: Help Me ! » Help!! » 2009-01-09 14:15:15

JaneFairfax wrote:

One way you can do it is by mathematical induction. Do you know what mathematical induction is?

I've always found this result rather surprising, and unfortunately induction isn't much of a 'why' method of proving things.

#97 Re: Help Me ! » trigo question » 2009-01-09 05:19:45

Solve? that isn't an equation.

#99 Re: Help Me ! » Mathematical Induction » 2009-01-09 05:17:45

Show us what you've done so far?

#100 Re: Help Me ! » Mathematical Induction » 2009-01-09 05:16:17

Eurgh, why do this by induction. Just let n = 2k + 1.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB