You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I think this is a nice result.
Offline
Indeed, this is a rather cool result. In fact, it generalizes fairly well. That is, if G contains a subgroup H of index p for the smallest prime dividing the order of G, then H is normal in G.
Do you know how to prove this?
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
The first mathematician to use the term group was Évariste Galois (according to the book A Course in Group Theory by John F. Humphreys). At about that same time, Augustin Louis Cauchy was independently studying these mathematical structures, but it was Galoiss terminology which became universally adopted.
http://z8.invisionfree.com/DYK/index.php?showtopic=118
Last edited by JaneFairfax (2009-04-14 05:12:59)
Offline
[align=center]
[/align]Offline
Last edited by JaneFairfax (2009-04-01 06:52:31)
Offline
[align=center]
[/align]Offline
Offline
Offline
Offline
Offline
Indeed, this is a rather cool result. In fact, it generalizes fairly well. That is, if G contains a subgroup H of index p for the smallest prime dividing the order of G, then H is normal in G.
Do you know how to prove this?
Ive just read it A Course in Group Theory by John F. Humphreys! It is stated as Corollary 9.25 on page 86.
I didnt know how to prove it, so I quote Humphreyss proof.
Apply Corollary 9.23 to the subgroup H to find a normal subgroup N with |G : N| dividing p! Since |G : N| also divides |G|, it divides the greatest common divisor of p! and |G|. Since p is the smallest prime dividing |G|, the greatest common divisor of p! and |G|, so |G : N| = p = |G : H|. Since N is contained in H, it follows that N is equal to H.
I have read every proof in my book carefully, and have followed every proof so far. I can thus safely say that I havent missed any trick, big or small.
Last edited by JaneFairfax (2009-04-14 05:13:17)
Offline
Pages: 1