You are not logged in.
Is it allright or is it dumb? Perhaps both? Yeah? I thought it was cool!
I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy...
Offline
Well.. I didn't guite get it! Please explain HOW? Is it some kinda joke? Is the "thate" in the end a typo mistake or is it written purposely??
If two or more thoughts intersect, there has to be a point!
Offline
Since truly know is truly be, Truly be is truly know, and hence a thing knows what it is
So a things true nature is its integral. To know what a thing is you must integrate it, it is its answer, moreover to know a things answer, you must integrate the thing itself.
Hence the answer of every question is its integral.
I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy...
Offline
I wouldn't say dumb, just nonsensical.
Since truly know is truly be
Truly to know something is to truly be that something? Is that what you mean?
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
BTW, LQ's signature is currently:
Truly Know is Truly Be,
That's why the integral of knowing is being
The integral of a thing (anything existent) is what that thing is, the answer of the question "What is That Thing?"
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
Good call MIF. Signatures can change, posts don't.
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
I wouldn't say dumb, just nonsensical.
Since truly know is truly be
Truly to know something is to truly be that something? Is that what you mean?
Itself I Am, lest I would not even know that it was there?
Without being a thing you could not experience it?
What you experience is what you are?
All you are is the sum of your experience?
the integral of the information you've collected and lost is you?
let's derivate that last statement:
Information you are becoming?
Itself you are becoming?
Indeed?
To truly know information is to be that information?
To truly know yourself is to be yourself?
To be yourself is to truly know it?
To be something is to truly know it?
To truly know is to truly be?
Itself I Am?
Know I That?
Am I Itself?
Is that what you are asking?
.egaugnal taht ni enil rehtona etirw tnow I
.llufniap yrev eb tsuM
.yas ot detnaw I lla s'taht "ma I flesti", sdrawkcab tnaw uoY
I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy...
Offline
Itself I Am, lest I would not even know that it was there?
It? What is "it"? What does "Itself" refer to? Do you understand what I mean by nonsensical?
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
Itself refers to what you experience!
I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy...
Offline
My head hurts.
Wrap it in bacon
Offline
It's mine aswell, we are charma based lifeforms, it is all stolen, we all head our way through the hurting.
Given what you know makes you happy it is unhappy then we become unhappy because we are what we know.
I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy...
Offline