You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
[align=center]
[/align][align=center]
[/align][align=center]
[/align]Offline
In fact, all norms on Euclidean space are equivalent. That is, they all define the same topology. This fact is quite useful for topology because it means you can take whatever norm is easiest.
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
In fact, all norms on Euclidean space are equivalent. That is, they all define the same topology.
Offline
Every norm defines a metric by:
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
So the norms for the above examples would be
Offline
Correct. And not every metric space has a norm. Can you name one that doesn't?
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
Arent norms defined only on vector spaces? In that case, any metric space that isnt a vector space wont be normal.
A norm on
has to satisfy the property that for all scalars and . This fails for the discrete metric when and .Discrete spaces are described by Sutherland as pathological examples of metric spaces.
Offline
Pages: 1