You are not logged in.
Hi;
I do not know how to get A(z) either. In the book it is a 31th order polynomial.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Offline
Hi 123ronnie321;
You are making a good point. One that I overlooked. You, me and gAr will have to come back to this. Right now I am knee deep in confusion. So please bear with me.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi all,
For that velocity, I considered the condition for only B (by mistake) . Otherwise, it has no integral solutions.
Bobbym,
These are the changes I did:
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
For that velocity, I considered the condition for only B (by mistake) . Otherwise, it has no integral solutions.
That is what I did too. I forgot to check E's speed.
Thanks for showing me your answer. if you have the time would you check the coefficient of x^50000 using your method.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
Okay.
I'm getting [x^50000] = 54445402801
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
That is correct, so I guess you are interpreting that formula correctly.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Yes, I had checked for [x^1000], [x^2000] and [x^3000], so I was almost sure about the formula. Also, [x^1000000] was very close to the approximation.
Very clever of them, pretty good closed form, isn't it?
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Yes, very good. Donald Knuth is one of the best there is. The other two are just as good. How the form is derived is amazing.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
New problem!
Warning! I suggest you leave this one alone. There is much disagreement and many traps.
An urn has 2 red, 2 blue, 2 green and 2 yellow balls. They are to be distributed into 4 boxes marked b1,b2,b3 and b4. Each box is to have 2 balls each.
What is the chance that all the boxes have no 2 balls the same color?
A says) Easy! 61 / 120
B says) I did not get that, I got 4 / 7 by counting them.
C says) I think that dummy B forgot that how you view a problem affects how you code it! A is correct as he usually is.
D says) I do not know about that code stuff, B and C sound like enemy agents. I got 27 / 50.
E says) C is partially right, 3 people programmed ( coded ) this and they all got different answers. I am going with B though!
What do you get and why?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
Last edited by gAr (2011-05-01 16:48:19)
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
Glad to see you too.
I believe my first try is incorrect.
Here's another, which I did by cases.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi,
Okay.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi;
What is the number you are getting for exactly 2 boxes having the same colored balls?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
There are 6 ways to have same colored balls in 2 boxes. Then use permutation with repetition.
Therefore, 6*4!/2! ways.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
That part we agree on so far. How many for 1 box with the same colored balls?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Okay.
That would be 4*4! ways.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi;
Of course there is no 3 boxes and 4 is 24. Do we agree?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi,
Yes, that's what I get.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Okay so it is on the last thing that we are not agreeing. What is the total number of ways to arrange the 8 balls in the 4 boxes? Remember I think rb is the same as br.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
So you are getting 264. I have a program that is counting them, it gets 282. That is where we are not in sync.
My answer is
Which is close to yours.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
That's a difference of 18 both in numerator and denominator.
So we need to check the case for different colored balls.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline