You are not logged in.
Take a look at this...
www.statesman.com/news/news/local/jury- … age/nRgqf/
Maybe somebody can explain the logic behind this....
If I run a red light and collide with another vehicle..
If the other vehicle is below the speed limit I'm 100% responsible.
If the other vehicle is speeding I'm partially at fault.
I don't see what relevance the speed of the other vehicle has with the cause of
the accident.
This is like saying somebody is at fault for an accident because they weren't
wearing their seatbelt.
Last edited by Fruityloop (2013-01-28 23:00:48)
Offline
I think you could call that being at the wrong place at the wrong time...
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
If the other vehicle is speeding I'm partially at fault.
I guess they want the other guy to take partial blame, after all he is breaking the law.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
hi Fruityloop and others,
I have checked out the link and can find no fault with it. Just an annoying advert that pops up when you first arrive at the site. So I have reinstated it in post 1. My apologies for the hold up but I felt it was better to be cautious, until I was sure.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline