You are not logged in.
You mean these, 3^(n+2) 3^(n+2) 3^(n+2)
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
I need a little rest, so I will see you later. Sorry but I am exhausted.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I have known it now - good!I need a little rest, so I will see you later. Sorry but I am exhausted.
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
You understand that?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
You understand that?
yes I do - thank you Bobbym, I have cottoned on.
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
It seems you once solved this, but upon reconsideration I did it so;
3^x + 3^(x-1) = 4
3^x + 3^x/3 = 4
3^(x+1) + 3^x = 12
xlog3 + xlog3 + log3 = log12
x(log3 + log3) = log12 - log3
answer = log12 - log3/(log3+log3)
Is the answer correct?
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
Hi;
That is not correct.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Why are you saying that? I was thinking it is correct
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
Plug in 1 to your problem.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
It gives 5, and not 4.
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
You should get 4 because that is what it gets when you plug into the problem.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Yes, it gives 4 - I did not put brackets around the x-1 as in 3^(x-1) when doing the plugging, but apart from your previous steps is there no other way to solve this problem? - I am asking because your factoring seems wierd to me.
Last edited by EbenezerSon (2014-09-21 00:48:37)
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
You could equate powers.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Bases are not the same why equating powers?
[I have long known that bases must be the same before powers are equated]
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
3^x + 3^(x-1) = 4
The bases are both 3 but you must get an answer of 1.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
So, should I take it from you that when bases at one side of an equation are the same one could equate the exponents regardless of the bases at the other side? As in the case this problem
Please confirm.
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
You are correct, there is a 4 on the other so equating is out but we can do a little algebra on it anyway.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Thanks for the confirmation.
Little algebra? Mmm, I'm confounded though.
Last edited by EbenezerSon (2014-09-22 09:47:46)
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
Hil
Only 3^0 = 1 so x must be 1.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I am thinking of why the 4 in the bracket appeared, in step three.
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
Did you understand step 2?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Yes I do understand step two - but step 3 confounds me.
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
Which part?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
In step 3, how did you get the 4 in the bracket?
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
3 + 1 = 4
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline