You are not logged in.
That makes v1(x) = v2(x) which makes the determinant 0 that means they are linearly dependent.
Seems nonsensical.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
That makes v1(x) = v2(x) which makes the determinant 0 that means they are linearly dependent.
Seems nonsensical.
So,what have I done wrong?? Is there an other way to do this?
Offline
Hi evinde
For the first part, use the fact that the Wronskian is non-zero and the fact that the determinant of the system of equations is the Wronskian at x=0.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Why is the Wronskian non - zero?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Because the exponential function is always non-zero.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
The determinant is 0 because v1(x) = v2(x), therefore the Wronskian is 0.
That is why I say something is very wrong.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Why is the Wronskian non - zero?
Also,because of the fact that the solutions are linearly independent!!!
Offline
Isn't that what are you trying to prove? Using it in the proof would be circular reasoning?!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi evinde
For the first part, use the fact that the Wronskian is non-zero and the fact that the determinant of the system of equations is the Wronskian at x=0.
How can I use these facts??I haven't understood yet...
Offline
Find the determinant of the system of equations given in the second to last line of your post 1. You will see that it actually represents the Wronskian at x=0.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Find the determinant of the system of equations given in the second to last line of your post 1. You will see that it actually represents the Wronskian at x=0.
Don't you mean these two:
, d_{1}{v_{1}}'(0)+d_{2}{v_{2}}'(0)={f}'(0) ?Last edited by evinda (2013-12-11 10:41:16)
Offline
Well, the point of finding the determinant is to show that there are solutions, so, yes, you can. Of course, you should treat d1 and d2 as the unknowns when finding the determinant.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Well, the point of finding the determinant is to show that there are solutions, so, yes, you can. Of course, you should treat d1 and d2 as the unknowns when finding the determinant.
So,I find the determinant and notice that it equals to the Wronskian,so it is
.And then?Offline
Yes, but first you need to find the Wronskian. You can do this using Abel's identity.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Yes, but first you need to find the Wronskian. You can do this using Abel's identity.
Do we have a
we could use?Last edited by evinda (2013-12-11 11:21:58)
Offline
Do you mean that I have to use
? I tried and got W(x)=(v1(0)v2'(0)-v2(0)v1'(0))*e^(-ax).Is it right so far?and how can I continue?Offline
What did you get for
(v1(0)v2'(0)-v2(0)v1'(0))?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
What did you get for
(v1(0)v2'(0)-v2(0)v1'(0))?
How can I find this value?
Offline
What do you get for v1(x) and v2(x)?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
What do you get for v1(x) and v2(x)?
I haven't found them..how could I do this?
Offline
It has been stated the v1 and v2 are the 2 solutions to the DE. Do you agree?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
There is an infinite nunber of solutions of the DE.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Without fixing c1 and c2, that determinant will always be zero. That means the Wronskian will be 0. Do you agree?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Huh?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
(v1(0)v2'(0)-v2(0)v1'(0))
Without getting the 2 constants v1 = v2, therefore the above expression will always be 0.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline