You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
6 to the power 4 is 6x6x6x6x1.
6 to the power 3 is 6x6x6x1.
6 to the power 2 is 6x6x1.
6 to the power 1 is 6x1.
6 to the power 0 is 1.
Therefore, every time we go down one, we lose a number on the end of each row.
So, 0 to the power 0 is 1.
What I don't get is that it's saying here that if you multiply zero by itself you get 1. In simpler terms one is equal to zero.
School is practice for the future. Practice makes perfect. But - nobody's perfect, so why practice?
Offline
Anything to the power 0 is 1. No-one knows why but it just happens.
I come back stronger than a powered-up Pac-Man
I bought a large popcorn @ the cinema the other day, it was pretty big...some might even say it was "large
Fatboy Slim is a Legend
Offline
That's not me point.
School is practice for the future. Practice makes perfect. But - nobody's perfect, so why practice?
Offline
it is now...
HAPPY HAPPY, JOY JOY
Fatboy Slim is the band of the 90s, thats if you want to call it a band because its really a one man name
Offline
No, it's not.
Boy let me tell you what:
I bet you didn't know it, but I'm a fiddle player too.
And if you'd care to take a dare, I'll make a bet with you.
Offline
killjoy
HAPPY HAPPY, JOY JOY
Fatboy Slim is the band of the 90s, thats if you want to call it a band because its really a one man name
Offline
i hope ur happy. u made stewie cry
I come back stronger than a powered-up Pac-Man
I bought a large popcorn @ the cinema the other day, it was pretty big...some might even say it was "large
Fatboy Slim is a Legend
Offline
It is NOT saying that multiplying zero by itself will equal one. Just look at 6 to the power 0. There is no 6 in your equation, only a 1. The "6x" part has been "lost" as a "number on the end of each row".
You're multiplying zero, zero times, and in essence doing nothing at all. Since the default is one, the answer is one.
6 to the power 4 is 6x6x6x6x1.
6 to the power 3 is 6x6x6x1.
6 to the power 2 is 6x6x1.
6 to the power 1 is 6x1.
6 to the power 0 is 1.Therefore, every time we go down one, we lose a number on the end of each row.
So, 0 to the power 0 is 1.
What I don't get is that it's saying here that if you multiply zero by itself you get 1. In simpler terms one is equal to zero.
Offline
Isn't the rule that x^0=1 when x =/= 0? (Sorry for the rubbish non-equal sign)
Why did the vector cross the road?
It wanted to be normal.
Offline
See What is 0 to the 0 power? for a good discussion of this topic.
2 + 2 = 5, for large values of 2.
Offline
IDIOTIC,
x=0 raise to 0.taking log,
log x=log0 raise to 0 or
log x=0 log0
log x=0[since 0* any number = 0)
but, log 1=0
so, x=1
Offline
... log x=0 log0...
The flaw in your proof is that the domain of the log function does not include 0. In other words, log0 is undefined.
2 + 2 = 5, for large values of 2.
Offline
Wheeeeeheeeeeee! I started off a good topic!
School is practice for the future. Practice makes perfect. But - nobody's perfect, so why practice?
Offline
Absolutely ... it is quite intriguing.
100000^0 = 1
10^0 = 1
1^0 = 1
0.00001^0 = 1
So, 0^0 = 1
BUT
0^10 = 0
0^1 = 0
0^0.00000001 = 0
So, 0^0 = 0
As it says in the mathforum article, it depends on which direction you come from!
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
Aha.......I see. So there's more or less two sides..........
School is practice for the future. Practice makes perfect. But - nobody's perfect, so why practice?
Offline
potentially
I come back stronger than a powered-up Pac-Man
I bought a large popcorn @ the cinema the other day, it was pretty big...some might even say it was "large
Fatboy Slim is a Legend
Offline
It's far easier to decide the value of 0^0^0.
Why did the vector cross the road?
It wanted to be normal.
Offline
Is it?
If you take the view that 0^0=0, then 0^0^0=0^0=0
If you take the view that 0^0=1, then 0^0^0=0^1=0
Haha, that is true!
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
0^0 is neither 0 nor 1;
it is simply not defined....
certain functions in mathematics are indeterminate,
like 0/0;
when the numerator of a number is zero, irrespective of the denominator(provided the denominator is not zero), the value is 0;
when the denominator of a number is 0, irrespecive of the numerator (provided numerator is not zero), the value is infinity
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
0^0 = (0^1)/(0^1) = 0/0 = (0*1)/0 = 0*(1/0) = 0*infinity = 1 , because 1/0 = infinity!
Last edited by Jai Ganesh (2009-01-25 02:54:01)
Offline
Anything to the power 0 is 1. No-one knows why but it just happens.
This is to fulfill the laws of exponents which state
However,
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
-- Boozer
Offline
Absolutely ... it is quite intriguing.
100000^0 = 1
10^0 = 1
1^0 = 1
0.00001^0 = 1
So, 0^0 = 1BUT
0^10 = 0
0^1 = 0
0^0.00000001 = 0
So, 0^0 = 0As it says in the mathforum article, it depends on which direction you come from!
My humorous professor during college would say that statistically, the result is ½ since we add both results then take the average. That's what he said when he was discussing whether 0 divided by 0 equals 0 or 1.
Actually I never watch Star Wars and not interested in it anyway, but I choose a Yoda card as my avatar in honor of our great friend bobbym who has passed away.
May his adventurous soul rest in peace at heaven.
Offline
MathsIsFun wrote:Absolutely ... it is quite intriguing.
100000^0 = 1
10^0 = 1
1^0 = 1
0.00001^0 = 1
So, 0^0 = 1BUT
0^10 = 0
0^1 = 0
0^0.00000001 = 0
So, 0^0 = 0As it says in the mathforum article, it depends on which direction you come from!
My humorous professor during college would say that statistically, the result is ½ since we add both results then take the average. That's what he said when he was discussing whether 0 divided by 0 equals 0 or 1.
0 or 1 may seem logical, not mathematical, strictly! It is Neither!
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
Pages: 1