You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
If you don't like zeros in our number system, then you're like me.
If we did away with zero, and replaced ten with the symbol "J",
then we could overload base-10.
You can only use a zero if it is to the left or right of all the other digits.
The number zero cannot be used within the the digits 1 to 9 and J.
Normally, 0.006035800001007 would become 0.005J3579999J9J7, I think.
And counting would be 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 J 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1J 21 22 23 24 etc...
This is kind of a joke, but isn't it fun??
The normal 55048.000789000099 would become 54J47.99J789999J99, perhaps.
I'm new to this, so my calculations might be wrong. Correct me if I am wrong or add more examples!!
igloo myrtilles fourmis
Offline
Not quite Base-11, maybe a Base-10.5
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
All the numbers without zeros in them will still be just the same I think.
So lets see, I'll start with ninety-five and count upwards:
Normal/Overload
95/95
96/96
97/97
98/98
99/99
100/9J
101/J1
102/J2
103/J3
104/J4
105/J5
106/J6
107/J7
108/J8
109/J9
110/JJ
111/111
112/112
113/113
114/114
115/115
116/116
117/117
118/118
119/119
120/11J
121/121
122/122
123/123
It's kind of interesting.
igloo myrtilles fourmis
Offline
I agree. Zero is definitly the most problematic and rule breaking real number. It jams almost every consistant property of numbers. If it weren't for zero, things would be a lot simpler...or would they? Zero is a natural and necessary part of our world. In fact I believe its considered to be one of the most important numbers in mathematics, right up there with e, pi, phi and i!
"People used to tell me I was worth nothing! Just look at me now!"-the number zero.
Sometimes I wonder if zero is actually a totally differt animal than real numbers. And we've just trained ourselves to pretend like it is. An abstract idea in attempt to treat a number with no magnitude like a number with magnitude.
A logarithm is just a misspelled algorithm.
Offline
Sometimes I wonder if zero is actually a totally differt animal than real numbers. And we've just trained ourselves to pretend like it is. An abstract idea in attempt to treat a number with no magnitude like a number with magnitude.
Yes, like infinity, except that zero is right there on the number line, somewhere between -1 and 1.
Zero came up recently when we were discussing number sets. It kind of breaks the rules by being both Real and Imaginary.
But if we have, say, 1+0i, we think of that as being the Real Number 1, likewise 0+i is the Imaginary Number i ... so does that mean that 0+0i is neither Imaginary nor Real ... ?
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
I'm not sure!
0 + 0i = 0(0 + i) which is 0(i).
If 1 + 0i = 1 then 0i = 0.
A logarithm is just a misspelled algorithm.
Offline
The Romans count without 0.
0 means "vanity" in Hindu language.
Last edited by George,Y (2007-02-12 02:06:34)
X'(y-Xβ)=0
Offline
Pages: 1